Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bubby Lyons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:19, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Bubby Lyons

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Bubby Lyons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL. Small town interim Mayor who's only coverage comes from the scandal that caused the mayor he replaced to resign. GPL93 (talk) 14:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Is it just me, or is Louisiana the place where we have the most overabundance of articles on residents.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. Neither Houma nor Mandeville are large enough to hand their mayors an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing as mayors, but the article is referenced nowhere close enough to actually get him over the "received significant press coverage" bar. Bearcat (talk) 18:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
• Delete: Per nom. @ User:Johnpacklambert, I haven't looked but the history of Louisiana politics may play a part. Otr500 (talk) 14:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Actually it is the result of the work of one very enthusiastic editor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.