- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to University of Chicago. Stifle (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Broadview Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article which makes no claim to notability and does not present multiple, independent, non-trivial sources. TM 14:02, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirectMerge to the article about the university. No independent and reliable sources are presented with significant coverage to satisfy notability. Edison (talk) 15:58, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Keep - this is one of many, many such proposed deletions by User:Namiba, and I respectfully suggest that he work toward consensus at Wikiproject Universities rather than proceed unilaterally. Racepacket (talk) 17:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Racepacket, please read the top of the page when editing this one. It says "Remember that the debate is not a vote, so recommendations on the course of action to be taken should always be sustained by arguments." What is your argument for keeping this article? The others? If you have multiple, verifiable third party sources to provide, fantastic. I may withdraw my nomination of some articles now that sources have been found. But simply disagreeing with my choice of process is not a rationale for keeping this or any other article.--TM 18:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect to the University article. I'm not seeing any independent reliable sources to suggest that this building is notable enough to warrant a stand-alone article. PDCook (talk) 13:50, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No claim to notability, let alone evidence of it. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:02, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm not finding anything at all in the Google searches provided above. The only thing that could save this article is if somebody could find out what its name was when it was a hotel, and then show that that hotel was notable. I have never heard anything about the history of the dorm/hotel, most likely because there is nothing to say. Speciate (talk) 05:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.