Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridge 9 Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 14:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bridge 9 Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks sufficient completely intellectually independent, significant, secondary coverage on the company and after a quick WP:BEFORE, I deemed that it lacks sufficient WP:ORGDEPTH coverage to satisfy NCORP. Graywalls (talk) 11:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, and Massachusetts. Graywalls (talk) 11:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: I found these articles: [1], [2]. They seem sufficiently in-depth, but might be too interview-y to establish notability. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Certainly one of the more important indies in the sense used at WP:MUSIC; the label released some of the most noteworthy punk rock of the last two decades (note that the nominator gutted this article of its discography immediately before nominating it for deletion, and it should be restored). As for coverage, there's more beyond what WeirdNAnnoyed dug up: [3], [4], [5], [6]. Amusingly, the label even makes the punk tabloids when Ben Affleck wears their t-shirt. Chubbles (talk) 18:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Also want to add: The Athletic: "one of Boston's most influential hardcore and punk labels" and Washington Post coverage. Issan Sumisu (talk) 16:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.