- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Bounce (game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Procedural nomination. Article was proposed for deletion with reason "Is this really ntoable? The game is just a nokia variation of what is probably a much older and more common game", and tag removed by creator. No opinion from myself. JPD (talk) 17:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability; no sources; unverifiable. Walton monarchist89 17:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, possibly speedy under A7. There's true no assertion of notability: instead it says it's "popular", but doesn't specify how or why. A cursory search shows that there's little sourcing to be found, mostly on forums or user reviews on review sites. Cheers, Lankybugger 18:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was the user who placed the tag (then mistakenly replaced it, opps) so "Is this really ntoable? The game is just a nokia variation of what is probably a much older and more common game" is my reason :) SGGH 19:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - does not establish notability through verifiable sources. Shaundakulbara 19:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete appears non-notable, and will likely not be expanded. Are there any other articles for cell phone games? --Nehrams2020 21:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.