Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood on the dance floor (band)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 July 4.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted and Salted. NAC. Joe Chill (talk) 19:22, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blood on the dance floor (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Author has twice restored a speedily deleted article. There is no reliable, independent referencing and no indication that the band satisfies WP:MUSICBIO. WWGB (talk) 01:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 01:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: And Salt. This was already speedy deleted multiple times under a different name and salted. Plus, the list of members is a hoax even though the band does exist. Joe Chill (talk) 02:00, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete with SALT Not notable, not a single chart, not a single ref. ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 03:09, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete tagged as A7 and possible salt. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:43, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and serve with salt - No evidence can be found that this band exists (once you've made your way through all the pages about a Michael Jackson album and song from the same. The "serve with salt" is because it's already been speedily deleted twice. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 13:06, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Actually the band might survive the speedy delete gauntlet because they have quite a bit of material available for official sale, even at Amazon (see this: [1]). It helps to do a search of the band name in conjunction with an album title or name of a band member, to get around the Michael Jackson album. Regardless, even with so much material I can find no evidence that the band or their many songs have been covered and/or reviewed by anyone beyond blogs, social network sites, and do-it-yourself retailers. Also, I agree with the SALT treatment until the band achieves something for real or until the article creator learns how to write. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:12, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:24, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt per the suggestions above. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 03:20, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted and salted per discussion. Someone please close this AFD; I can never remember how to do it. Nyttend (talk) 12:20, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.