Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bismillah Chowk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Stifle (talk) 08:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bismillah Chowk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this is a government recognized place/union council. Routine mentions in newspapers, fails WP:GNG. BookishReader (talk) 17:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Passes WP:NPLACE now,... which states..."Cities and villages are generally kept, regardless of size, as long as their existence is verified through a reliable source".

WP:GEOLAND says..."Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable"....Ngrewal1 (talk) 23:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm WP:NPLACE doesn't say the thing that you quoted. I think there used to be something similar at WP:PLACEOUTCOMES but that was changed quite a while ago. –dlthewave 15:56, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This appears to be a Chowrangi or crossroads. It does not appear to be officially recognized, and the two newspaper sources are passing mentions which neither support the "residential neighborhood" claim nor establish GNG. –dlthewave 15:59, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Previous and old description was wrong, I have made the corrections and made it much more specific now. It's a Chowrangi or crossroads within the residential neighbourhood of Saeedabad, Karachi in Baldia Town. Thanks for pointing it out, gave me a chance to correct some mistakes on this article. Notability is supported by the 3 newspaper references now. Ngrewal1 (talk) 17:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source Analysis:

Unfortunately I don't see anything here that comes close to establishing significant coverage, even after sources were added and the article was corrected to describe this as a square/intersection. –dlthewave 02:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work. Thank you. BookishReader (talk) 21:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.