Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhagwan meena

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted and SALTed. Alexf^(talk) 18:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bhagwan meena

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable politician, Most of the references are not related about the subject. I found only two references [1 2] where i found subject's name, but these are not enough to justify subject's notability. Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG Jai49 (talk) 15:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete I've already tagged it as it's an attempt to re-create a heavily SALTed article. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
GPL93, is there an AfD that deleted him at some point or has everything been A7? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barkeep49 I am actually unsure, I tagged it because it is likely an attempt to game the system. If the CSD is declined then I will change my vote to delete and SALT given its previous history of repeated recreation. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with salt. Nothing stated here satisfies WP:NPOL, the quality of the sourcing is not getting him over WP:GNG in lieu, and as noted there is a long history of attempted recreation at multiple different titles to evade salt. I don't think it's immediately speediable as a recreation of deleted content, because even the one prior AFD discussion I can find (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhagwan singh meena) was also just graduated directly to speedy instead of engaging traditional AFD process, but that still doesn't make it keepable. Bearcat (talk) 17:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.