Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behrad Shahriari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doing us all a favor and closing this one early. Missvain (talk) 00:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Behrad Shahriari

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

This was CSD A7 tagged by User:CommanderWaterford but it has been continually removed by IPs. Shahriari fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:GNG. Full source analysis to follow. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article very good references and very number site— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk • contribs)
Keep The article has excellent sources such as Ganja Music and imdb. In my opinion, the article should remain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alone ghpo (talk • contribs) 17:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:IMDB; having a page on IMDb is not an indicator of notability. Ganja Music is about as unreliable as it gets. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source analysis - this entire article is pure spam and there is absolutely nothing about him in a WP:BEFORE search. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:04, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table
Source	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=/g/11gy89ns9c&hl=en-IR&q=behrad shahriari&kgs=80aa42732195894b&shndl=0&source=sh/x/kp&entrypoint=sh/x/kp		This is a Google search not a source	✘ No
https://mehravaz.com/tag/بیوگرافی-بهراد-شهریاری/		This is just a link to download one of his songs	✘ No
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm12427668/bio		IMDb is an unacceptable source for a living person	✘ No
https://www.musixmatch.com/lyrics/Behrad-Shahriari/Delbandam/amp		These are just some lyrics, not a reference	✘ No
https://ahangify.com/artists/5b3a2d3fc85f881e175b0645		Self-published Spotify-like page	✘ No
https://aloonak.com/behrad-shahriari-delbandam/		More self-published media	✘ No
https://www.irantunez.com/artist/behrad-shahriari		Links to download his MP3s	✘ No
https://www.prince2music.ir/behrad-shahriari-ghabl-az-to/		Yet again links to download his MP3s	✘ No
https://nex1music.ir/tag/behrad-shahriari/		More spam links	✘ No
https://mrtehran.com/artist/2266		Another music app profile page	✘ No
https://fazmusiciha.com/آهنگ-بهراد-شهریاری-من-مجنونم/		Another spam MP3 link	✘ No
https://aloonak.com/behrad-shahriari-pashimoonam/		Another self-published site	✘ No
https://www.mybia2music.com/113923339/behrad-shahriari-tanhaye-tanha		Links to download his songs	✘ No
https://www.dalfak.com/w/euh1z/بهراد-شهریاری-با-اون-باش		A video of him singing	✘ No
https://upmusics.com/بهراد-شهریاری-مخاطب-حرفام/		Unreliable source, no significant coverage of him, just a posting of his lyrics	✘ No
https://www.ganja2music.com/771565/behrad-shahriari-eshtebah/	Ganja2music is obviously unreliable	More download links	✘ No
https://www.telewebion.com/episode/1321859		Video uploaded by him or someone connected to him	✘ No
https://www.music-single.com/		More spam links	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Keep In my opinion, the article is qualified. Of course, more corrections are needed to make the claims credible, but for now I see no reason to remove them. The article must remain — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.212.138.108 (talk) 17:07, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Yes, you are right But instead of deleting the article, please help the article and add it to the source. This is my only request. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk • contribs) 2021-05-09T17:09:37 (UTC)

Second vote by this person; I recommend a canvassing or puppeteering investigation for the "keep" voters thus far. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per Spiderone, WP:SPAM, no signs of notability CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:27, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Spiderone's source analysis is convincing, and it represents all that can be found with both the Persian and English spellings of the musician's name. The article is clearly an attempted promotion for a musician that has gotten himself into all of his country's typical social media and streaming sites. Those are not reliable sources and only show that he and his music can be found online. Wikipedia articles are supposed to serve a different purpose. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:18, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Google search does not turn up any reliable sources that are independent of the subject and talk about the subject in depth. All sources used in the article are self-published and user-generated sites or retailers and fail to establish notability. This is a WP:SPAM page. --Ashley yoursmile! 08:48, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't vote on subjects for which references are in a language I neither speak or read. However, I'm troubled that all the keep votes are seemingly the result of canvasing and sock puppetry. Also, Spiderone's source analysis is about as damning as one can get. ShelbyMarion (talk) 17:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a current SPI open at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aliasghar ghorbandokht. Aliasghar ghorbandokht and Alone ghpo have actually already been CU-blocked on Wikimedia but the Wikipedia SPI hasn't been closed yet. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Spiderone's accurate analysis and Doomsdayer. When will the keep voters (I mean voter) learn that download links, mp3 and videos are not reliable sources? GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 15:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.