Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basic Safety Training

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to STCW Convention. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basic Safety Training

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambiguous term. I couldn't find reliable sources to show it is notable. Boleyn (talk) 18:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Education, and Transportation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This article is about part of the STCW Convention: [1]. The scope of the article does not appear to be ambiguous. James500 (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
unnoticeable :GQO (talk) 8:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Merge: I agree the subject on itself is not likely to be notable and as written it is basically unsourced but it is likely some of this information can be salvaged and merged with the main STCW Convention. Jtrrs0 (talk) 15:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Merge with STCW Convention~~ A basic explanation can be merged, but this topic lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Most of the sources I've found via a Google Scholar search appear to be extremely low quality, such as this article published by a a predatory publisher; a Master's thesis (see WP:THESIS); and this article, where instead of using citations, the author supports his assertions by calling them "obvious[]". voorts (talk/contributions) 22:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On reconsideration, redirect. I truly can't find any reliable sources about this that would even warrant a summary in the STCW article. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or just redirect without merging. There's a citation needed template on nearly every sentence of this article. What is there to merge? -- asilvering (talk) 04:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The information about the basic training, which appears to be correct, can be merged with a cite to a primary source. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As per current discussion there are two options - merging or redirect without merging. More input needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: this is an important topic. The STCW Convention needs work, and including this properly (with cites) is an appropriate first step. Safety and safety training is very important (notable), I don't see that as debatable. For certain it is too small/short to be by itself. Ldm1954 (talk) 02:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.