Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbados–Chile relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sole keep vote provides little or no explanation; while it was considered, I gave it appropriately little weight in evaluating the discussion. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barbados–Chile relations

this article was previously nominated in a group nomination, upon closer inspection, I believe it is not notable due to lack of coverage of actual bilateral relations, almost all is multilateral [1]. it needs something more significant than a few meetings and wanting to cooperate such as this. the article also uses synthesis to imply that Mercosur and CARICOM meetings and negotiations are actually bilateral relations. such information is more appropriate to Mercosur and Caricom articles or indeed a new article such as CARICOM-Mercosur relations which is notable in its own right. LibStar (talk) 01:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ignoring for now that the article seems to be based mostly on a multi-lateral agreement, and that nothing mentioned is earlier that 2005 even though relations have supposed to have been in place since the sixties, there is no independent coverage of the topic as a whole, just snippets relating to individual events over time. --BlueSquadronRaven 17:55, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 18:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 18:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per previous. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:52, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Per previous what? Niteshift36 (talk) 20:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I tried my best to find something more than them establishing relations in '67 and then a visit in 2005, but... nope. "The Prime Minister Owen S. Arthur will on November 7-8 2005, pay the first ever official visit of a Head of Government of Barbados to the Republic of Chile". A single visit after 40 years? Obviously Barbados doesn't put much importance on this relationship. Fences&Windows 17:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lack of actual notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.