- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Balls Boys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was proposed for deletion last year with the rationale "Student radio programme, fails WP:NOTE by not being quoted in any independent third-party sources - only references are in other student-run media and not independent publications." The prod notice was removed without reason, and the concerns have not been addressed. As it's already been prodded, I can't do it again, so bringing here. As far as I can see, the prod rationale was bang-on, and so I recommend delete. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 15:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Article is about a non-notable programme and lacks reliable sources. Jimmy Pitt talk 18:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:08, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep references shows notability, also I have heard the show.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- How do the references show notability? They aren't independent of the subject, which is what we require. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:46, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 14:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.