- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bahirbhoomi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NF, and does not meet GNG either. Htanaungg (talk) 04:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Htanaungg (talk) 04:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Htanaungg, Make sure you check the article one more time before taking any action. Thank you. Msnlalithprem (talk) 18:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- *Keep WP:BASIC, i reviewed the reliable non-English news sources. Asianet News1, NTV (India)2, CNN-News18 3, Namasthe Telangana4
- AgniPuthra (talk) 02:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Htanaungg, Make sure you check the article one more time before taking any action. Thank you. Msnlalithprem (talk) 18:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Msnlalithprem (talk) 18:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I always prefer articles with two reliable reviews, but Dilse, Sakhi (2023 film), Kaalam Raasina Kathalu etc exist. DareshMohan (talk) 23:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep according to the references mentioned in the article.
- Induvadhone (talk) 03:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I'd like to hear some opinions from editors more experienced in AFD article and source reviews.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Passes GNG and NFILM. The sources, even though non English, shows decent reviews and in depth analysis, and aren't passing mentions. SIGCOV cleared therefore and can be kept as a standalone article. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:09, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The sources while fairly short are sufficient to establish notability for a film. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:01, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.