Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badlands Tour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 04:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Badlands Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Use a primary source (the artist's website); not covered by the media - so it will stay unreferenced, lack of relevancy. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Though the page does not currently have adequate relaible sources for verification, it is still covered in the news. The page needs some work but I don't see any reason to delete it. Seems pretty notable. Meatsgains (talk) 22:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Meatsgains I'm struggling to find a reliable/known source through those news. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I mean the tour isn't covered in sources such as CNN, BBC, or The Times, but there are certainly known sources out there: [1], [2], [3], and [4]. Meatsgains (talk) 22:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Only in the second is the main subject. The other ones is a "and by the way, she is.." Cornerstonepicker (talk) 23:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I just went through and hand picked a few of the sources that were reliable. I'm sure there are others covering the tour in greater detail. Meatsgains (talk) 23:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. sst 00:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. sst 00:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 12:26, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.