Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autopsychosis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopsychosis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album, as per Wikipedia:NMUSIC#Recordings ES &L 14:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's notable enough to be listed on Allmusic.com, still, if sources are the problem shouldn't I look for more reliable ones?--Jacoblikesmetal (talk) 09:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Being listed on allmusic is not sufficient for notability, as per WP:NMUSIC. Not every song or album gets a Wikipedia article - there are many checkpoints the song needs to reach first ES &L 10:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an entire album we're talking about, most bands get their albums mentioned before songs get their own page.--Jacoblikesmetal (talk) 09:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re-read WP:NMUSIC - only notable albums get articles. Not rocket science here. ES &L 12:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:41, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I did a Google search and only got download links. No reviews, no commentary, nothing. Fails WP:NALBUMS. — ΛΧΣ²¹ ^{Call me Hahc21} 01:52, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Allmusic is no litmus test for notability - their aim is to have EVERYTHING in their database so additional and substantial coverage is required for an album to merit an independent article. There are a lot of albums on Wikipedia which fail this requirement but plenty of articles exist that probably should not. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 00:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.