Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Srivastava

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I have ignored the long (and difficult to understand) post by Eon5185, who only seems to be here to get this article deleted. Randykitty (talk) 16:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Atul Srivastava (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Srivastava Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A handful of minor roles, but doesn't come close to WP:NACTOR in my view. I'm sympathetic to the argument that it's usually harder to find written information on Indian topics than Western ones, but when it's a BLP we're talking about, caution is called for. Subject must have played minor and supporting roles in various films and TV shows, but fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Mentioned only in passing in cited media articles (which themselves are mostly second-tier sources), and I couldn't locate anything more comprehensive Delete 18:35, 5 September 2015 (UTC) David — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManishSrivastava1 (talkcontribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:40, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Dharmadhyaksha for fixing that on 7 September 2015. --Bejnar (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yobot werldwayd Timtrent RscprinterBot onel5969 MBisanz ManishSrivastava1 Kraxler GoingBatty Dharmadhyaksha Davey2010 CoffeeWithMarkets CommonsDelinker First time I am seeing this type of politically favoured message. This message does not sound good and shows some kind of ‘CONFLICT’

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding Eon5185 (talk) 16:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC) at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts or canvassed users may be tagged using: username (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. or Note: An editor has expressed a concern that username (talkcontribs) has been canvassed to this discussion. [reply]

Now I am writing true facts ‘Remember to assume good faith’ on article “Atul Srivastava”. What is now posted on wikipedia, looks like paid article (As most of “Mumbai Wikipedians” are famous as paid editors for struggling actors on pretext of giving them some kind of fake publicity and some kind of notability). Wikipedia editors should understand that this so called article on Atul Srivastava going to be bad reference for wikipedia in coming future as most of the time "Mumbai Wikipedians" blamed as working paid editors. These so called "Mumbai Wikipedians" editors has nexus with Mumbai based news papers journalist who help each other to create some kind of news and than links to wikipedia article to make ‘Noble’ and ‘Noticeable’. Interesting to note that this article on actor Atul Srivastava become ’Noble’ in few days. Please check the authenticity of given references on Atul Srivastava article. I have tried to compare all kind of available sources and it fails in every test including ‘NACTOR’. Please take decision after reading these two contradict articles by same news paper "IndianExpress" on Gulaab Gang: One as reference used by wikipedia editor[1] and now one I am showing you genuine reference that Atul Srivastava is not noble[2]

Please note Reference No: 1. a b c d e (for all five) gives only one News Paper Indian Express[1] source. Surprised to see for Reference (1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e) there is only one reference. Lets read this bogus fake article written by a paid journalist(dated=9 March 2014):

  • Bogus Article on Gulaab Gang by Indian Express: ‘Gulaab Gang’ an important milestone of career: Atul Atul Srivastava has done minor roles in films like ‘Lage Raho Munna Bhai’ and ‘Bhootnath’. After gaining appreciation for his minor roles in films like ‘Lage Raho Munna Bhai’, Munna Bhai MBBS’ and ‘Bhootnath’, actor Atul Srivastava says his character in Soumik Sen’s ‘Gulaab Gang’ is an important milestone of his career. Atul, 52, believes that his portrayal of a corrupt Block Development Officer in the movie, which released this Friday, will be appreciated by the audience. “I am getting good reviews about his work in Gulaab Gang. In the movie I get into a tiff with the Gulaab Gang leader Rajjo (Madhuri Dikshit), as I am playing a corrupt officer who charges bribe from the villagers to provide them electricity,” Atul told PTI. Talking about his working experience with Madhuri, Atul said, “Madhuri is a brilliant actor, and working with her has been a great learning experience for me.” This year Atul will deliver three more releases. In April ‘Chal Bhag’ will be released in the direction of Prakash Sainy, in which Atul plays a constable. Trained in acting from the Bharatendu Natya Academy in Lucknow, Atul will next play a protagonist in a film based on a story by Ravindranath Tagore – ‘Daak Ghar’. The film is titled – ‘Agar-magar, lekin, kintu-parantu’. Pradeep Das will direct the film. Apart from these Atul will be seen in Anurag Kashyap’s ‘Bombay Velvet’ and Johny Walker’s son’s ‘Chahe Mujhe Koi Junglee Kahe’ under Bombay Talkies productions. - See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/gulaab-gang-an-important-milestone-of-career-atul/#sthash.ySA2RUom.dpuf

After reading this ‘Full of lies’ article I have reached on this conclusion. References:

  • 1. a: Lucknow.[1][1]
  • Remarks: ??? Does not make any sense.
  • Conflict: Just to write something. Atul Srivastava article should talk about his work.
  • 1. b: 2003 - Munna Bhai M.B.B.S.[1] as the overacting fake patient[1][1]
  • Remarks: This given fake ‘Indian Express’[1] article reference itself talks about that Atul Srivastava has done ‘MINOR ROLE’ in film Munna Bhai M.B.B.S.[1]
  • Conflict: Wikipedia Article on Munna Bhai M.B.B.S.[1] does not have his name in the credit ‘Cast’ list. It means Atul Srivastava has not done any work which could be noticeable in this film.
  • 1. c: 2006 - Lage Raho Munna Bhai[1][1]
  • Remarks: This given fake ‘Indian Express’[1] article reference itself talks about that Atul Srivastava has done ‘MINOR ROLE’ in film Lage Raho Munna Bhai[1]
  • Conflict: No Proof on IMDB. Wikipedia Article on Lage Raho Munna Bhai[1] does not have his name in the credit ‘Cast’ list. It means he has not done any work which could be noticeable in this film.
  • 1. d: 2008 - Bhoothnath[1][1]
  • Remarks: This given fake ‘Indian Express’[1] article reference itself talks about that Atul Srivastava has done ‘MINOR ROLE’ in film Bhoothnath[1]
  • Conflict: No Proof on IMDB. Wikipedia Article on Bhoothnath[1] does not have his name in the credit ‘Cast’ list. It means he has not done any work which could be noticeable in this film.
  • 1. e: 2014 - Gulaab Gang[1][1]
  • Remarks: This given fake ‘Indian Express’[1] article reference itself talks about that this film Gulaab Gang[1] an important milestone of his career.
  • Conflict: No Proof on IMDB. Wikipedia Article on Gulaab Gang[1] does not have his name in the credit ‘Cast’ list. It means he has not done any work which could be noticeable in this film. As per given ‘Indian Express’[1] article reference: Means Atul Srivastava has not done any thing noticeable (noble) before year 2014 - Gulaab Gang[1] film. It means he is not ’notable’.
  • Contradiction (EXPOSED): Now read the same news paper Indian Express[4] contradict article which does not talk about Atul Srivastava and his work in Gulaab Gang. If you read an article they even did not mention the name of Atul Srivastava in [Gulaab Gang]] article. Please read this article from same news paper Indian Express[5]
  • Genuine Article on Gulaab Gang by Indian Express:[6] Indian Express[7]: Now lets read this genuine article written by an honest journalist talk about (dated=8 March 2014):

Film review: ‘Gulab Gang’ is actually the old-style good vs evil story Madhuri Dixit’s 'Gulab Gang’ has nothing to do with Sampat Pal’s real-life ‘Gulaabi Gang’. Madhuri Dixi’s gang, on the other hand, is as make-believe as make-believe can get. ‘Gulaab Gang’ is faking it. Review: Gulaab Gang Movie review: Gulaab Gang Cast: Madhuri Dixit, Juhi Chawla, Tannishtha Chatterjee, Divya Jagdale, Priyanka Bose Director: Soumik Sen So fine , maybe Madhuri Dixit’s ‘Gulaab Gang’ has nothing to do with Sampat Pal’s real-life ‘Gulaabi Gang’, even if both wear pink saris, and fight for women’s rights in a rural North Indian outpost. The difference between the two films ( and ‘Gulaabi Gang’ did the smart thing by releasing just ahead of the Bollywood take) is stark : the first , featuring the plain-faced Sampat, is a hard-hitting documentary ; Madhuri Dixi’s gang, on the other hand, is as make-believe as make-believe can get. ‘Gulaab Gang’ is faking it. Fearless Rajjo ( Dixit) runs a sort of a `gulabi gurukul’ in a village named Madhopur, where she teaches little girls their alphabets, and grown-up girls how to wield a `lathi’. Her ‘gang’ is made up of women wearing bright pink, and the ones closest to her are a ‘boy-cut’ tomboy type ( Jagdale), a woman abandoned by her husband ( Chatterjee), and a kohl-eyed dusky female( Bose). These ladies accessorize their pink with oxidized silver, and at least one them has a very spiffy manicure, as they go about standing up for the meek and the downtrodden, and going up against villainous husbands, cops and politicians. But from its opening frame you discover that in its supposed feminist garb, ‘Gulaab Gang’ is actually the old-style good vs evil story, styled in the tired way these films have been for the longest time. Its chief baddie is, ta da, a woman. Sumitra Devi ( Chawla) is the sort of politician that men have played for ever : hungry for power, will stop at nothing, not even murder and mayhem. She rules with an iron fist and a sneer, and Chawla makes the most of her part, even if all the lip-chewing and narrowing-of-the-eyes doesn’t amount to much. Dixit doesn’t even rise above her pink sari-and-sickle, though you can see her trying her hardest with all the flying-through-the-air stunts, cleaving bad men’s clavicles, and so on. How can you take a film seriously when each bout of `lathi’-clashing is interspersed with group dances, with Rajjo-Rani doing the familiar Dixit` latkas’ and `jhatkas’? In a deeply offensive scene, Sumitra Devi makes a fellow crawl between her subordinate’s legs : I don’t know who cringed more– me, the viewer, or the two people who were in that scene, the woman who is ordered to spread her legs, and the man who is forced to crawl in between. - See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/movie-review/film-review-gulab-gang-is-actually-the-old-style-good-vs-evil-story/#sthash.vdQYUiiF.dpuf

  • 2. BIG Television Awards.[2][8]
  • Remarks: English translation of “Big Bechara Character Male (Fiction) means “Big Poor Guy Character Male (Fiction). I didn’t understand what kind of award was this ? Editor has given wrong reference: Big Television Awards started in 2011 and to be closed down because of irregularities and authenticity of nomination and nominees in that same year 2011. Please note it’s a “ARCHIVED FROM THE DEAD URL[8].
  • Conflict: No Proof on IMDB. There is nothing written about BIG Television Awards[2] on Wikipedia Article page. BIG Television Awards: Please do see Revision history of "BIG Television Awards: Revision history" in ‘Edit’
  • 2. 2009-11 - Bhagyavidhaata as Sharada Prasad (father of Bindiya, Poonam, Renu and Raja) (on Colors TV)[2]
  • Remarks: As per wikipedia article Bhagyavidhaata’’ ‘Cast’, Atul Srivastava name not given in first season. I can see Atul Srivastava name in second season that also 14th from top in the list of cast.
  • Conflict: If Atul Srivastava character was so important in TV Series 'Bhagyavidhaata’, Atul Srivastava should be atleast on top or close by of the given ’Cast’ list and most probably Atul Srivastava should be on both the season of Bhagyavidhaata’’. No Proof on IMDB

3. 2004 - Loknayak as Lal Bahadur Shastri[3][9]

  • Remarks: Bogus Reference - How wikipedia editor can use and predict this source as a genuine reference? When this film is never released and censored.!! Anyways given reference of Atul Srivastava name does not have any importance in the given reference article.[10]
  • Conflict: No Proof on IMDB

4. 2015 - Bajrangi Bhaijaan as Bajrangi's father (Cameo role)[4][11]

  • Remarks: Given reference does not talk much about Atul Srivastava and his character and work, instead it only says in one line ‘FIVE MINUTE CAMEO DONE BY Atul Srivastava’ ‘MINOR ROLE’.

5. 2013 - Tota Weds Maina as Tota's father (on (SAB TV)[5][12]

6. 2015 - Service Wali Bahu as Jogeshwar Prasad, Payal's father-in-law and Dev's father (on Zee TV)[6]]][13]

Film/TV Year Atul Srivastava’s Film/TV on Internet Movie Database (IMDB) Atul Srivastava’s Film/TV on Wikipedia
Kehta Hai Dil 2002-2005 No Proof on IMDB
Munna Bhai M.B.B.S. 2002-2005 No Proof on IMDB No Proof on Wikipedia
Loknayak (film) 2004 No Proof on IMDB
Kareena Kareena 2004-2005 No Proof on IMDB
Lage Raho Munna Bhai 2006 No Proof on IMDB No Proof on Wikipedia
Pandey Aur Pandey 2006 No Proof on IMDB
Banoo Main Teri Dulhann 2006-2009 No Proof on IMDB
Bhoothnath 2008 No Proof on IMDB No Proof on Wikipedia
Bhagyavidhaata 2009-2011 No Proof on IMDB
Lapataganj 2009-2014 No Proof on IMDB
Tota Weds Maina 2013 No Proof on IMDB
Gulaab Gang 2014 No Proof on IMDB No Proof on Wikipedia

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l "'Gulaab Gang' an important milestone of career: Atul". Indian Express. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
  2. ^ "'Gulaab Gang' Film review". Indian Express. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  3. ^ "'Bhartendu Academy of Dramatic Arts ALUMNI'". B - Positive. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  4. ^ "'Gulaab Gang' Film review". Indian Express. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  5. ^ "'Gulaab Gang' Film review". Indian Express. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  6. ^ "'Gulaab Gang' Film review". Indian Express. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  7. ^ "'Gulaab Gang' Film review". Indian Express. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  8. ^ a b "BIG Television Awards 2011". BIG FM 92.7. Archived from the original on 15 June 2011.
  9. ^ Pranava K Chaudhary (19 October 2004). "Uncensored 'Loknayak' to be screened soon". The Times of India. Patna. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
  10. ^ Pranava K Chaudhary (19 October 2004). "Uncensored 'Loknayak' to be screened soon". The Times of India. Patna. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
  11. ^ Dasgupta, Piyasree (20 July 2015). "Less Bhai in a Salman film: Why Bajrangi Bhaijaan is becoming the actor's biggest hit". Firstpost. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
  12. ^ "It's All About In-Laws & Your Bride!". India West. 7 January 2013. Retrieved 8 September 2015.
  13. ^ "Zee TV launches Service Wali Bahu". The Times of India. 15 February 2015. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.