- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aspen Woolf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Company not significant enough to be on Wikipedia Piousious (talk) 16:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 March 26. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:18, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I couldn't find any coverage (except a Daily Mirror article about a disgruntled customer). Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. Schazjmd (talk) 23:01, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.