- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Aquasermo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Implicitly contested prod. Article about a rather expensive gizmo meant to be used for advertizing, but with little or no actual usage asserted. The promised sources turned out to be primary, that is, associated with the subject. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 18:00, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Usage of this product has been added.
Gstsqs (talk) 18:36, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Funny, the only non-third party source available, the BBC news link, was a dead link. No third-party sources found, so fails WP:N. DARTH PANDAduel 01:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.