Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollo Ends

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sculptured. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:49, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo Ends

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination on behalf of an IP editor, whose rationale (from their declined prod) was "has allmusic.com, but progarhives.com and encylopediametallum are not reliable sources: fails wp:n". On the merits, no opinion. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 16:01, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:34, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Sculptured. Non-notable in itself. --Lockley (talk) 18:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 08:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as not notable (or even redirect without merging because none of the content is sourced). One reasonably informative ref is not enough. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.