Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjub Botawala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anjub Botawala

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing notable about him. No coverage found. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete another in a long line of non-notable cricket players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 06:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not meet requirements of WP:NCRICKET --Whiteguru (talk) 09:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Notable content not found for this cricketer. TheDreamBoat (talk) 10:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Gujarat cricketers - lacks the evidence of notability for a stand-alone article Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.