- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Andy Huwe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable secretary of the political party, flowery language for submitting laws to another person to get passed. Not meeting GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 14:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 14:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Oregon. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:45, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete refs include LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. The only RS source is a routine article in the local news about the subject declaring himself as a candidate. Also borders on meeting WP:G11-speedy deletion criteria given its promotional nature. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable local political candidate. JTtheOG (talk) 05:55, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable candidate for political office, there's only one reference that's any good at all and that's a candidacy announcement. Reads like a CV. SportingFlyer T·C 13:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.