Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrey Vlasov (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:53, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andrey Vlasov (disambiguation)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use. PROD removed by @Salvidrim!: with edit summary "Not eligible for PROD (previous 20180419 PROD deletion contested by recreation). must use an applicable CSD criteria or XFD > Undid revision 1233186368 by Shhhnotsoloud" but 20180419 was before this page was created at 20:39, 28 August 2018‎. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification - @Shhhnotsoloud: yes the first revision of the current iteration of the page is 28 August 2018 but you can see it its deletion log at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Andrey_Vlasov_(disambiguation)&type=delete that a previous incarnation was deleted as an expired PROD 19 April 2018. Unfortunately per policy (WP:PRODNOM), a page is no longer eligible for PROD if it was nominated (deleted or not) via PROD previously. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 20:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Russia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unnecessary DAB. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 14:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete disambiguation page is not required, as @Shhhnotsoloud mentioned. I think that’s enough of an argument, nothing else needed. Vorann Gencov (talk) 08:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.