Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Thaker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amit Thaker

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He was the president of his party's youth young. He is the secretary of his party's state wing. And he holds a post of his party's affiliate organization's state wing. These are not enough for passing WP:NPOL. The sources are presentd in the article are not enough for passing WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:40, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:40, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:40, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or alternate Merge to Bharatiya Janata Party. This article is more about a party that involves the subject than a WP:BLP so is a pseudo biography. This is evidenced by the 5 sources from "The Hindu", one from "One India" (out of 6 sources), so only two sources advancing notability, and only one (The India Times: "Amit Thaker takes over BJP Yuva chief") is predominantly about the subject and still in relation to BJP. Otr500 (talk) 09:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it severaly lacks citations for the claims made in the article. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 16:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 21:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I made a comment and the article has no improvements since then. Based on my findgings the subject fails WP:NPOL. Coverages are WP:ROUTINE. KartikeyaS (talk) 15:53, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist - would like a little more commentary on delete or merge as a suitable target
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:58, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The references are WP:ROUTINE and he doesn't have any coverage or notability to pass WP:NPOL. No meaning to merge as there are 100's of such leaders of a large political party in India. - The9Man ^(Talk) 09:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN. He is not an elected politician.DMySon 11:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL Alpateya (talk) 20:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alpateya is a blocked sock for User:Dorama285. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.