- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Amazifier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find substantial, independent, RS coverage for this software product on gnew or gbooks. Tagged for notability since May. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 21:59, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No RS significant coverage - only reference is to a non-english site which appears to be a blog. Created by an SPA as possible advert / promotional. Dialectric (talk) 16:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not sure if the Itlaian source is a reliable one, but the review is rather short, and I can find no other coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 16:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.