Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allah Baksh Sarshar Uqaili

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. listed for 21 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Allah Baksh Sarshar Uqaili

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions 16:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It would seem from this deletion log that there is a newspaper source in Sindhi about the subject, indicating possible notability. It's a pity that the article creator's talk page is full of templates without any attempt to engage in dialogue, as that is probably the most likely person to be able to help with finding sources. I feel the need for an essay on the lines of "don't template the newbies". Phil Bridger (talk) 23:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article should be kept as it is full of information about a historical personality and this deletion log this source has got nothing to do with this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.103.137.32 (talk) 17:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have added a citation the the Daily Ibrat based on this message from the article creator, who appears to feel well and truly bitten. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 22:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If the page is eventually to be deleted, my suggestion is that it be moved into original author's userspace. I've offered to help clean it up, FWIW. Nuujinn (talk) 12:55, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:09, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep for the time being. I've been working on this, but haven't found any decent references. One question I have that perhaps someone can answer--the article Sarshar Uqaili (another rendering of the name of the same person) was deleted for copyright violation. Does anyone have access to that that discussion? If the article was determined to be a copyright violation, surely someone must have had access to a source that I have been unable to find. My mind wobbles. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:15, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep It seems likely that ths person is notable, and that a Wikipedian familiar with this culture could improve the article and add better references. Cullen328 (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.