Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Ievleva
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Alexandra Ievleva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable figure skater; no senior-level international medal placements. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:03, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Skating, and Russia. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:03, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - all citations are stats pages and mentions, nothing significant. Shinadamina (talk) 05:17, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The corresponding Russian article has a few decent sources, such as [[1]] and [[2]]. We probably need to look a bit closer into sources from Russia here to determine if the subject is notable or not. Let'srun (talk) 01:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:10, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Why are you nominating/voting if you can't do a one-minute search?
Here: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. (The last one is about her as a coach and about Zahra Lari who she coaches.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 23:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Why are you voting if you can't be troubled to acquaint yourself with the provisions of WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV? Your first link isn't about the subject, but is an interview from her (which is explicitly debarred from counting towards notability, as the subject's own words is not a reliable source) about her coach. Second link: another interview of the subject. Third link: another interview of the subject. Fourth link: another interview of the subject. Fifth link: another interview of the subject. Sixth link: another interview of the subject. Seventh link ... you got it, another interview of the subject. Not a SINGLE ONE of your links is a third-party, independent reliable source, and I strongly recommend you review the requirements for the same before serving up more link salad. Ravenswing 06:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)