- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Editorial concerns such as removing promotional language can be discussed on the article talk page. (non-admin closure) ansh666 02:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Alex and Ani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I tried to clean up the promotionalism but there's nothing else there. the so -called references are fundamentally press releases DGG ( talk ) 20:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - One of the most significant jewelry companies in the US, major and significant press coverage spanning many years, ranging from network news to major newspapers to fashion magazines. A simple Google News search shows dozens more recent RS. Jeremy112233 (Lettuce-jibber-jabber?) 22:24, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - for all the reasons Jeremy112233 mentioned. The article needs improving (and is appropriately tagged as such), but it's a legitimately notable entry.Innisfree987 (talk) 02:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.