- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 12:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Up-and-coming singer, speedy deletion was overturned at deletion review. An extended version of the article is here. Procedural nomination, no opinion, etc., etc. ~ trialsanderrors 07:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - seems to have good rotation around the country [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] (#1 listing (!)), satisfying WP:MUSIC criteria. Had a charted hit (granted, #91, but it is charted: [6]]). However, the international tour part is the most important: cited [7], which seems to be verified: [8]. Definitely not the top artist in the country, but does seem to squeak by WP:MUSIC and have enough notability for WP. Part Deux 07:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep somebody should work on those sources to merit a unconditional keep Alf photoman 15:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Clear Delete Fails WP:MUSIC w/a bunch of self-released albums. Eusebeus 16:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Meets WP:MUSIC, and just scrapes through the notability criteria. --SunStar Nettalk 17:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This singer is associated with a notable musical movement (New Weird America) and is shown to be in cooperation of many notable musicians. But this article need to be cleaned-up somehow. Wooyi 00:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.