Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aircut (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AirCut

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established by reliable sources. Consider speedy deletion as recreation of deleted article ("Aircut"). Novangelis (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. Ad-spam. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:41, 19 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - No coverage in reliable sources aside from the local paper coverage noted in the article. That is not sufficient to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 15:28, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.