Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhash Kumar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abhash Kumar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was originally an autobiography and has since been substantively edited only by WP:SPAs. It is in the florid and promotional language common for Indian PR biographies. It contains much of the WP:PEACOCK. Guy (help!) 09:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 09:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 09:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Poorly written and poorly sourced article with a promotional PR / WP:PEACOCK tone – "renowned", "prestigious" etc. There are a few bits on news searches for him, but not enough good sources in my view to establish significant notability. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 05:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Cops are supposed to solve crimes. Bearian (talk) 01:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Lack of referncing for a BLP is a problem (and would be a draftifiction case); however, there is little that I can find to support any referencing, and the existance of SPAs mean that draftification is unlikey to work. Britishfinance (talk) 01:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.