Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Warriors Trial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Warriors Trial

Non-notable fiction with no sources, and nothing at Google. The original author of the article admits to being the author of the story. Using Wikipedia to get his fame for his non-published story? AnyPerson (talk) 23:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not actually meet and speedy delete category But totally non-notable. DGG (talk) 00:29, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable. Camw (talk) 02:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N. Firestorm (talk) 06:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable self promotion. Baileypalblue (talk) 13:35, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete put an end to self promotion. JBsupreme (talk) 09:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Obviously non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 00:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, while WP:JNN is not a valid reason for deletion, I am unable to verify this article's content through reliable sources from Google Books, Google News, Amazon.com, etc. I agree that Wikipedia should not include articles that are essentially about unpublished stories we editors have written. Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 15:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obviously, per nom. Hobartimus (talk) 01:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.