Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Puebla earthquake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Puebla earthquake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. Not of lasting significance. No deaths, injuries, or damage. —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. -- —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:48, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails the Rule of 7. Carrite (talk) 06:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Wikipedia is not a place for news. There is no evidence of lasting impact, no deaths or damage. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 13:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although it made news when it happened, it didn't get mentioned at all afterward. [1], so I can't see any argument for historic notability. I note that we have no article at all about an earthquake that happened near there in 1973, or others in Mexico that would be historically significant. These are mentioned in List of earthquakes in Mexico, and perhaps that list can be expanded to make mention of minor events such as this one. Mandsford 14:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, but I laugh of "the rule of 7"'s awkwardness. Diego Grez (talk) 22:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever works, works. If an earthquake is under 7.0, it has to "squish lots of people or break lots of shit" to be included. Carrite (talk) 01:44, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 07:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.