Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1912 German Men's Eight Rowing Team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Normally, I would find an excuse to go with Kusma's suggestion of a redirect, per WP:ATD, but in this case, this seems like such an unlikely search term, it's pointless as a redirect. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1912 German Men's Eight Rowing Team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the individuals have inherent notability due to having competed at Olympic Games, no inherent notability exists for Olympic teams. Rowing teams can be notable, and 1972 New Zealand eight (article does not exist yet) and 1982 New Zealand eight (notable, but they didn't perform well at the 1984 Summer Olympics) are examples. I cannot see why the 1912 German eight could possibly be considered notable. Fails WP:GNG. Schwede66 19:02, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I find it difficult to understand how individual team members can be considered notable for competing in the Olympics but the team that they are part of cannot. This was a team competition, and the medals were awarded for being part of the team, so surely the team is at least as notable as any of its individual members? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's easy to reference the article - that is not the problem. The standard reference website is Sports Reference. In 1912, there were four Olympic rowing events, and Germany sent five boats to compete in three of those events; there were two teams that competed in the eights event. The scope of the article that we have covers one of those teams; as such, it's not entirely accurate (it should at least mention that there was another German eights team). I very much doubt that all the 1912 rowing teams taken together would reach the notability threshold. I have just written a summary article for New Zealand rowers at the Summer Olympics (i.e. covering all Olympic appearances) and that certainly meets notability criteria. It is, however, a lot of work. It's also complicated to define the scope for a German equivalent, as the country was split after the second world war, they competed as separate nations, then had a united team for a couple of Olympic Games, then competed as separate nations again, and then the reunification happened. Schwede66 03:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I should further note that the German Wikipedia has an article titled de:Deutschland-Achter, which translates as 'German eight'. It's an expression that was formed in 1959 and refers to the representative eights team of Germany, i.e. is not specific to a particular team, but at the time also did not cover East Germany (which makes sense, as in 1959, they were separate countries). That article lists this 1912 team, and that's a much more appropriate way of dealing with it. Schwede66 18:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.