Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1213 (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Proto::► 10:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1213 (video game)

Non-notable. Original research. No reliable sources to support importance. Fails WP:SOFTWARE. Andre (talk) 21:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:SOFTWARE. Non-notable game. Lorenj 06:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I added some sources and removed some OR material. Better now? 81.79.29.103 19:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, —Larry V (talk | contribs) 23:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 00:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I really can't see how this is notable. Koweja 00:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I'm not so sure what the problem is... the game was made by a quasi-notable developer (who is more notable in the genre of this game, which, by the way, I've never heard of), and has multiple independent reviews published; at least one of the reviews comes from a reliable source, PopMatters. -- Kicking222 01:24, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Just barely meets the primary criterion of WP:N. Ccscott 18:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think it still fails WP:SOFTWARE. Nandesuka 18:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nom.Anomo 23:14, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - Because I've never heard of it and am not qualified to make a call. Although, I think the article could be improved, when was it written, why, who cares?, how many downloads? etc? SweetGodiva 22:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no substantial coverage by multiple reliable sources. Sandstein 06:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.