Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/116th Weather Flight
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to 194th Regional Support Wing. Consensus is that there is no real indication that this flight is independently notable. Interested users can feel free to merge any useful information to the target page as the article history has been left intact. ~ mazca talk 02:07, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- 116th Weather Flight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This stub with 320 characters (not including external links or templates) does not have enough significant coverage from multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject to be considered notable. Generally units of this size (smaller than a squadron/company) are not considered notable by WP:MILUNIT, nor is it a combat unit. — -dainomite 01:52, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. — -dainomite 01:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Why on earth would the fact that it isn't a combat unit be relevant? Combat units are no more inherently notable than non-combat units. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:19, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that part of my statement was misinterpreted. I didn't mean delete it just because it isn't a combat unit. Non-combat units more often than not lack notability due to a general lack of coverage from independent or reliable sources. — -dainomite 17:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to 194th Regional Support Wing. Redirect to notable higher level command authority.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:07, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to 194th Regional Support Wing. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:12, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.