- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Euryalus (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Ádám Borics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable MMA fighter does not meet WP:NMMA or WP:GNG. The primary editor seems to represent a MMA company which gave him an award of some sort. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete No top tier, or even second tier, fights so fails WP:NMMA. There's no significant independent coverage to show he meets WP:GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 17:39, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- userfy Passes GNG, but not NMMA. Lots of information on News [1] 173.52.99.208 (talk) 20:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment--user 173.52.99.208 has been blocked for block evasion. Papaursa (talk) 01:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The "news" items consist of fight results, which does not show significant independent coverage. Papaursa (talk) 23:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable mixed martial artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete' as I'm still not seeing any convincing signs of independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 00:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.