User talk:Xanchester/6

Latest comment: 12 years ago by EdwardsBot in topic The Signpost: 15 October 2012

By topic
DYK (12) • SignpostWikiLove

By date
1234567

Military history coordinator election

edit

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the projectwhat coordinators do) 09:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

edit

Thanks

edit

Thank you for your third opinion at Talk:John Crosfield. It was useful and I'm sure the article's quality will improve as a result. --Drm310 (talk) 22:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Seeing how a massive wastage of time it is

edit

Can I retract my DR??? It will save you a lot of time and energy. I want to formally withdraw my Dispute Resolution. Mrt3366(Talk?) (New thread?) 15:00, 12 September 2012 (UTC) I am withdrawing the DR. Close it. Mrt3366(Talk?) (New thread?) 15:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar!

edit
  The Barnstar of Justice
For your sustained effort in resolving disputes on Wikipedia, I, Fowler&fowler«Talk», award you this barnstar. 04:34, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sri Lanka

edit

Why did you close the Dispute resolution discussion - Report of the Secretary-General's Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka ? It won't solve until all the parties agreed to the solution. I am not agree to the your final conclusion. --207.46.55.30 (talk) 05:31, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

My edit at Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Christian_right

edit

I haven't been involved in a lot of DR, so if my hiding of some comments at Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Christian_right was unwelcome, feel free to undo. However, based upon comments at User_talk:Sphilbrick#Christian_right, I fear that the editor is refusing to participate. It may be that he or she is hoping someone will beg him or her to continue. I'm not so inclined, but if you want to, that's your call.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 20:06, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

edit

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready

edit

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

  1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
  2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
  3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
  4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at [email protected] and, second, email [email protected] along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
  • Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
  • Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:14, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Request for mediation rejected

edit
The request for formal mediation concerning CBS Records, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 11:34, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Barnstar!

edit
  The Mediator Barnstar
For your ongoing hard work at DRN, I award you this barnstar :-) Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 21:08, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Psychotherapies ArbCom

edit

I haven't named you as a party, but I think you might want to comment on Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Psychotherapies given your moderate involvement on ANI and DRN on this matter. Thanks, Tijfo098 (talk) 11:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hot Cat discussion at VPP

edit

Thank you for your interest in the discussion at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Proposal:_enable_HotCat_for_all_editors_by_default. Please note that I have now proposed 5 different, more nuanced versions of the original suggestion, to better gauge to what level (if any) we are willing to make Hot Cat more accessible. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of The Pharaoh Who Conquered the Sea

edit

  Hello! Your submission of The Pharaoh Who Conquered the Sea at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Maile66 (talk) 18:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

edit

A page you started has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Novel coronavirus 2012, So God created Manchester!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I stub sorted the article.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Novel coronavirus 2012, So God created Manchester!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I stub sorted the article.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
For writing IBM Mira :). Ironholds (talk) 22:08, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
No problem :). Ironholds (talk) 12:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for The Pharaoh Who Conquered the Sea

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Changing a DR/N closing

edit

It is generally the same as any other content dispute. Please disuss the change on the talkpage when you alter another volunteers closing. According to our limited guidelines: "Close" - This marks a discussion that has been closed, because the discussion is unsuitable for DRN. The 24 Game filing was at the right venue but failed to recieve any participation past the original filing. "Failed" - This marks a discussion that was not resolved successfully and has been closed because of inactivity. The latter is the prescribed closing template for this simple closing due to lack of participation.--Amadscientist (talk) 03:55, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and thank you for the notification. There was a previous discussion on the talk page over the ambiguity between closed and failed cases. The ambiguity may still persist, and if so, a new discussion would be appropriate. Ironically, I was the one that wrote the description for the new failed status and phrased both the closed status and failed status the way it is now. I apologise for the unintentional ambiguity of the wording, and if there was any confusion over the difference between the two, it was likely my fault.--sgcm (talk) 09:27, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Ambiguity in prose can be changed. I support your effort to make such changes as long as it doesn't change the current status criteria. However...the point is not the ambiguity in the prose, it is your chnaging another volunteers closing staus. That is not acceptable behavior for a DR/N volunteer without discussion and consensus. Is this something that has been discussed and agreed on? Perhaps I missed that part over the last few months.--Amadscientist (talk) 19:49, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Case status for requests are sometimes changed from closed back to open, so I did not think that my edit would be controversial. If it has been interpreted as a bold edit, then I apologise. As per WP:BRD, the next step is discussion on the talk page.--sgcm (talk) 21:38, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Card-carrying Communist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheeling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Card-carrying Communist

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 00:07, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

edit

Incomplete DYK nomination

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Masters of Money at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

edit