Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Michael Mullan. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dustitalk to me 20:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Mullan, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dustitalk to me 20:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Mullan, you will be blocked from editing. Dustitalk to me 20:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Nilvadipine, you will be blocked from editing. Dustitalk to me 20:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


WP:NLT

edit

You need to immediately read and understand our policy against Legal threats, located here, and then you need to immediately retract your last post on User talk:Dustihowe, or you will be immediately blocked from editing. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've looked further into this. You'll notice that the two articles that you are being "warned" about have now been protected from editing, with the material removed that you were attempting to remove. Please keep in mind that Dustihowe (and myself) were acting in good faith and attempting to protect the integrity of Wikipedia. Please use this talkpage (or the talkpages of the relevant articles) to discuss why you feel the material should stay out. You are not blocked from editing, also please refrain from creating multiple accounts. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:NLT

edit

I'm not sure what you are refering to, but please explain and see WP:NLT. Dustitalk to me 20:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

YA DOOD!!!

edit

NICE GOIN YOU TELL EM WHOSE DA BOSS! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK MAN! Sumba (talk) 22:15, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Swedish Mutation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:07, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Sci-brain

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sci-brain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dlohcierekim 18:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Sci-Brain logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Sci-Brain logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicci Kobritz (September 15)

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


 
Hello! Venkatms11, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicci Kobritz concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicci Kobritz, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicci Kobritz

edit
 

Hello Venkatms11. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Nicci Kobritz".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicci Kobritz}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply