SusanLesch
Articles | Boxes | DYK | ITN | News | Stars | Stats | Talk | User |
---|
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SusanLesch. |
Deletions: Go ahead and delete any of my uploads. I would prefer no deletion tags on my talk page please. If I happen to sign on during a discussion I will try to contribute. Rules and fads come and go. Licenses are harder to change.
April editathons at Women in Red
editJanuary 2020 at Women in Red
edit January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
Anti-Racism and WMUG
editHi Susan,
I would like to discuss this with you off wiki. DM me at @voxpopulare and I will give you my email address so we can communicate in more detail in a more private manner before communicating publicly.
RachelWex
Women in Red August 2024
editWomen in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
edit- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
ITN recognition for Audrey Flack
editOn 5 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Audrey Flack, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 9
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minneapolis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metropolitan Council.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
edit- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
Women in Red August 2024
editWomen in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
edit- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
File:John Sebastian-Welcome-1976.ogg listed for discussion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Sebastian-Welcome-1976.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 19:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
editHi SusanLesch :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
edit- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
edit- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
Women in Red October 2024
editWomen in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Congrats!!!
edit!!!! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you kindly, FFF! My writing teacher told us we each get five lifetime exclamation points. We both hit our quota today. 😃 -SusanLesch (talk) 20:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Featured Article Save Award
editOn behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, SusanLesch! Your work on Redwood National and State Parks has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 14:43, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, Nikkimaria. Very happy we were able to save this one. -SusanLesch (talk) 23:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Uff Da! Editing the Wikipedia for Absolute Beginners
editWiki UFF DA! - Editing the Wikipedia for Absolute Beginners | |
---|---|
Join us at one of our three FREE workshops in Minnesota, where you can learn how to edit Wikipedia and add Minnesota's local history in a relaxed and supportive setting. Work alongside others and discover how easy editing Wikipedia can be. The workshops aim to enhance the ability of communities in Greater and rural Minnesota to edit Wikipedia and comprehend it's editing culture and guidelines, as well as to expand Wikipedia's coverage of Minnesota's history. Already good at editing the Wikipedia? You're welcome to come and work on local history Minnesota Wikipedia articles alongside others. Registration is required to be included for lunch. Event 1 @ Morris, MN
Event 2 @ Chisholm, MN
Event 3 @ Mankato, MN
Facilitator: Myotus | Joe Hoover These workshops are put on by the Minnesota Historical Society as part of their commitment to the Minnesota local history community and are led by Local History Services. |
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
edit- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
November 2024 Minnesota User Group Meeting
editIn the area? You're invited to the November 2024 Minnesota User Group Meeting
The organizer of this soiree is Joe Hoover aka Myotus feel free to drop him a message.
Okay its been a while since the Wikipedia Minnesota User Group has meet. Since the last time we meet there has been social upheaval, plague, etc... - no small thing to be sure. There has been some sad lonely discussions on the Minnesota Meetup page on getting together but little action. So here it is. Come and be seen. Talk about future the Minnesota User Group and see what nefarious plans we can hatch. Date: Sunday, November 3, 2024 Look forward to seeing folks!
|
Invitation to participate in a research
editHello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
Women in Red November 2024
editWomen in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 31 December 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/December 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 17:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
edit- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
editHello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
The Signpost: 18 November 2024
editArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Thankyou for your work on Donald Trump
editHey Susan, I'm sure you know how appreciative I am of your work over on Donald Trump. I have very high hopes for where we can get this article, and having editors like you with experience working in featured content processes provides extraordinarily valuable insights. I read an essay once where it said you should not be able to extrapolate an editors opinions from their edits. I agreed with that, and I really admire how you are one of the few on the page to whom I can say that applies given your commitment to NPOV. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 16:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! From one Marion Nestle fan to another, we've got our hands full. -SusanLesch (talk) 19:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I saw your comment on avoiding the lede. I'm also trying to avoid the lede. I've noticed tone creeping into your comments: definitely don't write messages other editors will read as calling them immature. I'm partly telling myself this as well; I have stepped back a bit shortly to the chocolate pages because I don't like what contentious topics apparently do to my heart. I'm sure you'll be able to take this message in good faith, that as far as Wikipedia 'needs' you on that page, you have a life outside. If this part of the hobby is not bringing you peace and satisfaction but irritation, I don't think it's worth it and there are plenty of articles on redwoods to write. Apart from all that, being short will also make editors feel you are against them and less inclined to take on your argumentation. Hope you're well. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Right you are. I will slow down and skip Trump talk for a while to cool off. Thanks for saying something.
- Incidentally, Internet Archive lost their lawsuit (which will affect a number of books available for free). -SusanLesch (talk) 15:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I saw your comment on avoiding the lede. I'm also trying to avoid the lede. I've noticed tone creeping into your comments: definitely don't write messages other editors will read as calling them immature. I'm partly telling myself this as well; I have stepped back a bit shortly to the chocolate pages because I don't like what contentious topics apparently do to my heart. I'm sure you'll be able to take this message in good faith, that as far as Wikipedia 'needs' you on that page, you have a life outside. If this part of the hobby is not bringing you peace and satisfaction but irritation, I don't think it's worth it and there are plenty of articles on redwoods to write. Apart from all that, being short will also make editors feel you are against them and less inclined to take on your argumentation. Hope you're well. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2024
editWomen in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Tangent
editThis is a thought inspired by Talk:Donald Trump#Childhood: Since it sounds like you have some decent books on hand, I hope you will replace some of the non-book sources, especially the WP:PRIMARYNEWS sources and the sources that are only used once, with better sources.
I feel like I'm explaining this badly, so to give an example, if the sentence says "The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dogs.<ref>Today's news headline</ref>", it would IMO be helpful even if you only replaced the refs with a {{sfn}} to a good book that gets re-used many times, even if you didn't touch any of the content. It would be better for the article to have 800 sfns to a couple of decent books than to have 800 refs to newspaper articles. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:38, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for a roadmap I can use. Can you think of Wikipedia policy I can point to that as reliable sources, books are preferable to newspaper articles? -SusanLesch (talk) 20:28, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- My main concern is WP:PEIS limits, and 800 small templates are less likely to break than than 800 huge templates (as measured in processing cost, not size displayed on the page), but to answer your question, I'd start with these two points:
- Scholarly sources are preferred over non-scholarly sources per WP:RS ("When available, academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly monographs, and textbooks are usually the most reliable sources").
- Primary sources, including WP:PRIMARYNEWS, should be used sparingly per WP:NOR ("Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, and to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources").
- A book, especially if it is written by an academic or published by a university press, could fall under both of those points. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Right! I am concerned about PEIS, though I don't understand it well, and my proposals to deal with it got poor reception. Cf. the edit notice on my user page.
- Wikipedia's bibliography of Donald Trump: About Trump gives me about 5 (out of 100) recognizably academic publishers (Texas A&M University: Jennifer Mercieca 2020, Oxford: Dan P McAdams 2020, Uni Chicago: Daniel W. Drezner 2020, Uni Virginia: Michael Nelson 2018, and maybe Brookings Institution: Hal Brands 2018). They aren't necessarily written with a neutral point of view. I picked two Pultizer winners (D'Antonio and Haberman) to start and I hope they help. -SusanLesch (talk) 23:09, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- That sounds like a good plan. In my experience, editors are usually concerned primarily about the text of the article, and if you don't touch that, they mostly won't object to replacing a one-off news article with a book that's already been cited repeatedly in the article. That article's a bit weird (e.g., a couple of months ago, we had editors defending a blatant violation of BLPPRIMARY), but I would think that replacing a lot of the single-use sources would be feasible. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- My main concern is WP:PEIS limits, and 800 small templates are less likely to break than than 800 huge templates (as measured in processing cost, not size displayed on the page), but to answer your question, I'd start with these two points:
The Signpost: 12 December 2024
edit- News and notes: Arbitrator election concludes
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel articles 5
- Disinformation report: Sex, power, and money revisited
- Op-ed: On the backrooms by Tamzin
- In the media: Like the BBC, often useful but not impartial
- Traffic report: Something Wicked for almost everybody
Wednesday, January 15, 2025 Minnesota User Group Meeting and 2025 Wikipedia Day Celebration
editIn the area? You're invited to the 2025 Minnesota User Group Wikipedia Day Celebration
The organizer of this feed is Joe Hoover aka Myotus feel free to drop him a message.
Wednesday, January 15, 2025 is Wikipedia Day and the Minnesota User Group is meeting to celebrate the day with a Tater Tot Hotdish Dinner!
To ensure that a helping of Tater Tot Hotdish is waiting for you at the meeting please RVSP on the event page. Transit
Look forward to seeing folks! Wear yer mittens!
|