SinaTheMaw

Your submission at Articles for creation: SinaTheMaw (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cyberdog958 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SinaTheMaw and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

cyberdog958^Talk 06:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, SinaTheMaw! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! cyberdog958Talk 06:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Vinny Troia. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 07:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Vinny Troia, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello. Can you please explain what I am doing that is disruptive, inappropriate or hard to read? SinaTheMaw (talk) 09:05, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Dorothygordz per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dorothygordz. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 16:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

{{unblock|Checkuser is not infallible. Please provide evidence of associated sockpuppetry. The only evidence provided by the original blocker is that i attempt to edited a photo related to a page that was also associated with those accounts. I have already made a claim and appologized for my wikicommons account, that was an oversight. I am not associated with any other accounts. It seems more likely that this is an oversight and should be properly reconsidered. }} SinaTheMaw (talk) 04:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SinaTheMaw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

analysis is incorrect. I am not associated with most of those accounts. I already mentioned that I am SinaCommonsEditor as I thought I needed to make a separate account. That was my error. The rest is incorrect.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 03:51, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SinaTheMaw (talk) 01:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

also, how is it possible that a page that i created on a separate subject, which was verified and reviewed by independent users, as been completely purged from wikipedia? SinaTheMaw (talk) 02:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)