Shenme

Archive from March 2005 to December 2006
Archive from February 2007 to March 2007
Archive from April 2007 to December 2007
Archive all of 2008 (68)
Archive all of 2009 (15)
Archive all of 2010 (4)
Archive all of 2011 (4)
Archive all of 2012 (4)
Archive all of 2013 (5)
Archive all of 2014 (4)
Archive all of 2015 (16)

RE:Flagging you

Oh, thank you, darling! But you don't have to be so rude ;) Regards! Delotrooladoo (talk) 05:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your recent edits to Computational Anatomy

Hi, thanks for your recent edits to Computational anatomy! ArguMentor (talk) 02:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about No Cross, No Crown

Hello, Shenme,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether No Cross, No Crown should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Cross, No Crown .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Prof. Mc (talk) 20:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your edits

Thanks for your edits on Jane Elizabeth Manning James! I'm not sure how all those 1900s typos got in there, but you noticed and took action, for which I'm grateful. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shenme. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

South Indian Diaspora

Thank you for warning 208.96.116.15 and reverting his attempt to redirect the page. He's been persistently adding nonsense, such as changing the heading "European Colonial period 1684 - 1947" so that it reads "Medieval Migration (1800 - 1950)", and lots of other bad edits. He's also been editing Template:Tamils which is probably also vandalism. I reported him for vandalism, but I could use some help cleaning up the article and template (I'm not knowledgeable about the subject). GBRV (talk) 19:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Response

Added a response on my talk page. Film915 (talk) 05:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Response

Added a response on my talk page. Film915 (talk) 05:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Response

Added a response on my talk page. Film915 (talk) 05:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Old news bad news

I read your message during my holidays, but did not answer because I had decided to disconnect as much as possible. Was tough :)
I was never a deletionnist by heart. I remember vividly that day in Cape Town when Anasuya wrote the article and was so proud. We had a break for coffee. Came back and .... yeah... had to do firewoman job for it. I still do not understand why people can be so quick in dismissing other people work. At the same time, reading myself again, I was clearly a bit dry with him. I am sorry about that. Anthere (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

LinuxInsider references brought to RSN

Hi Shenme, I just followed up on this discussion on Knowledgebattle's talk page on WP:RSN. I pinged you there but I want to be sure you're notified. Thanks. ZackTheCardshark (talk) 21:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Rashtriya Inter College Surir

Hello, Shenme Thank you for the lookup over Rashtriya Inter College Surir. I find it's a minor problem. Rashtriya Inter College Surir is know widely range over the local public & student book mention with same, so we can not change the same. if you might think it's needed. you can do Changes or One More Think one of my Village Wiki Page Need to Changes or source with Native Name Bhidauni as Bhidoni both names exists. both names will possible to set over Wikipedia. can I discuss to fix the same. Village Graph Page is on Good Standard.

Thank You!

You Can Changes

Rashtriya Inter Collage Surir to Rashtriya Inter College Surir. You Can Do. please do it Correctly.

Edits

" identification and analysis " - "and" separates yet connects two things, so plural 66.61.85.149 (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Serge Geoffrion

Apologies, I was busy trying to get the rest of the Quebec MNAs who didn't have articles at least up and running. Editing biographies is fine, I just wanted to eliminate the red since these are all/were elected officials.--Jack Cox (talk) 05:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Not Simple English

Your change to Human has been reverted, because this is not the Simple English wikipedia. If you keep simplifying the vocabulary, who are you really serving? That is, which narrow grade range have you decided to aim Wikipedia at? For every grade level below college you would be able to find words you thought inappropriate. That process, repeated, will reduce every text to "Human: you, me, we! Wheee!" I've been worried that Wikipedia was moving from mish-mash to purée. Yes.

BTW: 'living' is simply the wrong replacement for 'extant', as 'extant' means something else. While "still existing" covers the usage intended here, that is the beauty of having definite, succinct words that fit the needed meaning better than other words or phrases. Shenme (talk) 04:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

While extant is perfectly correct, so is living. I get that you like the word extant, indeed I like it too, but WP:LEAD indicates that accessibility is prioritized in lead sentences, and 'extant' is significantly more obscure than 'living' and the latter has the same meaning here.

'living' does not (directly and obviously) include the sense that there were several to many preceding and/or coexistent species, and we happen to be the one of all those that remains. You may feel that "the only living members" implies all that. "the only remaining members" says that. "the only still existing members" says that. But "the only extant members" says that just as well and more succinctly. The sentence is trying not only to tell of existence, but existence in relation to the preceding species. Moreover, it ('extant') is standard language when talking about species and families.

Point of fact 'living' is exactly the same length as 'extant' and, yes, it means the same thing. The word 'succinct' doesn't mean what you seem to think it does either. Given the significant mismatch between what you are saying and the evident reality perhaps you should apply for a job working for Donald Trump.

Which brings us to "difficult-to-understand terminology", which is what I can believe you meant I should see in WP:LEAD. This 'terminology', this meaning, is rather integral to understanding the complete statement. And if every word in the first sentence has to be super easy, it misses by a mile even with your change. Even the Simple English article misses badly at getting the facts across in simple English. (I tried and I never could figure out how to write in Simple English - 'real' simple English) Wikipedia must not aim for "fortune cookie" text.

(And now I'm off to change 'adobe' to 'abode', found while seeing if I could find examples of 'extant' in ledes. There are some, even in first sentences, but didn't yet see as significant an example as Human.) Shenme (talk) 06:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Yeah; I really don't care. I find you to be annoying, pretentious and you are writing self evident untruths, as justification for reverting my edits. This is something which I do not respect in any way, it is corrosive to the project that is Wikipedia. Thank you in advance for not ever writing anything ever again on my talk page.GliderMaven (talk) 16:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Discussion invite

Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs (talk) 04:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

New move request for New York

In case you are still unaware of this discussion, there is a new discussion for renaming New York to New York (state). As you participated in the previous discussion on this topic, you may want to express your opinion in the new disussion. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Judy smith ref 6

I wasn't quite sure what you were referring to at first, but I see on more careful review that I got the chain of communication on the Rittenhouse Square sighting wrong. Thanks! I have duly corrected it. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Typo

Greetings! It was indeed a typo. Cheers-- Soupforone (talk) 05:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shenme. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

re: What is unclear here?

It's pretty simple: it's an unreferenced claim. If you can verify that 'it is the most popular' with one of the other sources, as well as other claims made there, please add a cite to this sentence. Personally, I think the claim is right, but without sources it may be WP:OR. (Ditto for the next sentence). This stuff is not WP:BLUESKY, not for the average reader (btw, I tagged this after a Korean friend asked me why Wikipedia claims to be neutral but uses SoJ name in article about LR without even mentioning ES alt name - and I have they have a point, particularly when I had to tell them that this is likely because SoJ is more popular - but that Wikipedia doesn't even reference this claim). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Mentioned you at ANI

The thread mentions your recent interaction with Onel5969, but is not about you. You are welcome to join in on the discussion or ignore it as you please, just notifying you as a formality. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Shenme for editing Veronica arvensis, yes I missed the end punctuation Freshclover (talk) 03:05, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your help desk questions

You did not get a response for a question regarding coordinates and Wikidata. I can't be sure, but your question looks like one for WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:16, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Did you find the solution for your section name anchor problem? If not this could be a question for WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Noi vogliam Dio

Dear Shenme, I've just noticed you wrote to me many months ago because I'd taken an "e" out of the wording for this hymn. Sorry! As I have just discovered, I made that edit SEVEN years ago; so I don't know if you are still interested in the thing. Please let me know and I'll certainly give you all the reasons. Safebreaker (talk) 14:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

"Suplus"

Done. Changed all instances from "suplus" to "surplus". MYS77 ^✉ 13:20, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

girobank

Hello Shenme, the easiest solution was to unlink girobank. Thank you for your interest.Taksen (talk) 08:47, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Notify about AFD on articles created by User:Bigtime Boy about roller coasters under construction

Related AFD of WP:CRYSTALBALL roller coasters:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Coast Racers
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamite (roller coaster)
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copperhead Strike

This is to notify you of ongoing AFDs on articles created by User:Bigtime Boy about under construction roller coasters --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 12:31, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

reproducing comments

I'm fine tuning the filter, and have been responsive. Once the filter is tuned, I'll be going back through the edits. I have more pressing issues than wikipedia right now. So please be patient.

Smasongarrison (talk)

That is reassuring. (And the real-life thing resonates with many here). Shenme (talk) 18:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

In the future, could you not jump to conclusions/give people the benefit of the doubt? Because I don't believe WP must trend towards Simple English and, by damn, Murrican Simple English

Then consider the statement an indication there are background issues in WP editing of long-standing, that you may be inadvertently reproducing with your edits. Please give great and due consideration to each of your edits, so as to avoid reproducing again the faults seen so many times before. Shenme (talk) 23:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Petros Lantzas

Sure, the correspondent article doesn't state something about Greek revolutionary movement. That time (1573) Greek cycles living out of the Ottoman Empire got upset after Venice decided to sign a peace with the Ottomans in 1573. They believed that Spain (including Naples) could support them in their anti-Ottoman struggle instead.Alexikoua (talk) 22:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Regards

Thanks. But I think it would have been better for me to pull back. I hope you don't mind I will be removing all that from the now blocked user from my talk page. Alanscottwalker (talk) 22:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abbey of Santa Maria in Sylvis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tondo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Wording in Disappearance of Tiffany Whitton

... without Caudle, who told Esquire he avoids the drug, finding out for some time.

That's why I didn't say "not". Daniel Case (talk) 01:03, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bab Jedid (Tunis), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zawiya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Pseudaelurus

Hey Shenme, I saw you recently edited a page on the pseudaelurus, I need to know which subfamily it belongs to, do you know by any chance? Zango.P (talk) 09:09, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shenme. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Appearance of advocacy

Regarding Ankara train collision, I wasn't advocating the use of singular they but thought some people might find that use odd, so that's why I linked it. But thanks for pointing it out. Mistakefinder (talk) 04:06, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Advice

Hello Shenme, I want ask you for your advice. I have source that I want to use on this article this article[1]. But I don't know that which section of that article I can add the source's information to. Shahanshah5 (talk) 12:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

References

Auditorium Theatre

It appears the Chicago Tribune archive is now on Ancestry.com. Sold to the Mormons, purveyors of fake religion since 1830. So no. What about Frederick Grant Gleason? It was four years ago, I really don't remember. Tried the Wayback Machine? MinorProphet (talk) 21:39, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

China

I did see the section China#Names, and I did see their breakdowns and "zhōng "central" and guó "state"" which don't match what others have for a long time written. "Middle" is the normal translation of 中 and is apt and poetic while "central" is rigid and a little boastful. "Country" is also the standard definition of 国, and "state" is rigid and inelegant; China is not just a state, it's a country (and a nation). Translations are natural not state defined. "The '-' dash bothers me for some reason." Its arguable that its non-standard form. Its not pinyin to use dashes but maybe it should be because its clearer, and inline with the monosyllabic separation between hanzi glyphs. "Multiple guides to pronunciation, including [ʈʂʊ́ŋ.kwǒ]." I would welcome some improvements to the IPA, but then which Chinese language/dialect would be the one used? The putonghua wins out here. -ApexUnderground (talk) 04:09, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

@ApexUnderground: Obviously 普通话 , but there seem to be so many variations on IPA, that using what already existed in the article - and presumably has already been argued over to consensus - might be a good thing? Some people will get upset at any change, but more people if the change ignores (seems to ignore?) previous text. Shenme (talk) 04:32, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

The IPA has two modes, one which honors the simple form and approximate pronunciation and the other which honors precise native pronunciation, even when the phonology is unusual. China having so many different languages means we go with the main one. ApexUnderground (talk) 06:54, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Harassment by Nickm57

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racial_discrimination&oldid=903968918

I recently made these edits. They are cited by this article (though you can find others):

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/12/are-jews-white/509453/

On the talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Racial_discrimination

some seem to disagree that the Jews were discriminated against. These seem to be the same people who believe that the holocaust never existed. Nick is just a really bad person. At this point, I believe I need administrative help.

Nick has a track record of stalking and disruptively reverting my contributions to wikipedia. I was hoping Nick could be blocked from editing, or that a report be submitted against him, at the very least. His abusive behavior is getting out of hand.

People like him also launched several smear-campaigns, simply because I wrote about some things that are well-sourced and well-documented that does not fit their chauvinistic point of view.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Xinjiang_Pages_and_User:Alexkyoung

I appreciate your input on this urgent issue. Wikipedia has no space for such bullying and abuse.

Alexkyoung (talk) 05:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Beams and specks meet the eye (it's Greek to me)

Have you seen situations like many short snippets of non-English text handled nicely? The editor has a particular presentation desired for these snippets, and that makes using a surrounding {{lang|grc|[πεμ]ψω αυτον ... του ζητειτε}} impossible. And adding lang templates to each each each small bit is a recipe for pain? Shenme (talk) 03:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

I tried putting a whole block in span tags manually, but unfortunatly Mediawiki auto-closes the span tag at the end of the line because of the other formatting. It's not too bad to put one {{lang}} per line, which works (other than the lines that already have span tags). Though I would question whether this amount of non-English text is appropriate for Wikipedia, especially since there's no English translation. I would be inclined to move the full text of this document to Wikisource. -- Beland (talk) 15:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	Thank you for catching my error on the vandal edit revert of Government of China and being diplomatic in letting me know. I appreciate it! KNHaw (talk) 18:21, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

MOS:HYPHEN and compound modifiers

I appreciate your hard work for the encyclopedia! But you are creating a lot of punctuation errors tonight. Compound modifiers are supposed to be hyphenated and you're taking the hyphens out of them. For example, if someone is in a commercial that is thirty seconds long, it's a thirty-second commercial. A break that lasts two minutes is a two-minute break. (A cup that is stained with coffee is a coffee-stained cup, not a "coffee stained cup"; a manual that is easy to read is an easy-to-read manual...) Unfortunately, many of the examples one sees in the media are incorrect also; it is very frustrating for some of us! The examples in MOS:HYPHEN regarding compound modifiers will illuminate this further, I hope. Thanks! - Julietdeltalima (talk) 04:13, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [email protected], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [email protected].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

The compound-modifier conundrum

Thank you again for your really thoughtful discussion on my talk page a few weeks ago about compound modifiers! (For what it's worth, I'm not an English teacher, but I'm a U.S. federal lawyer, which means my job requires me to analyze specific grammar and usage every day. Unfortunately, this also means I sometimes can't take the time in one sitting to answer good questions like this, and I apologize again for the delay.)

The ultimate answer to your question is that it's almost always obvious from the rest of a particular sentence what a particular compound modifier is intended to mean. This is really subtle and you are not to be faulted for finding it weird and confusing. Your analysis shows that you are far more scholarly and precise than most native English speakers I know professionally (in other words, other lawyers, who get paid to write and analyze very precise English sentences for a living, who have in some cases been doing so for decades).

A good example is with respect to Dick Vitale. (I'm making up these facts quickly to highlight weird usage questions; they aren't intended to be accurate.) Let's assume these facts:

• Dick Vitale recorded thirty-seven promotional ads for ESPN.
• Each of those ads lasted thirty seconds.

Under MOS:NUM, the correct rendition of this is "Dick Vitale recorded 37 30-second promotional ads for ESPN," which has the benefit of eliminating the hyphenation question. But, if you were spelling out the numbers, the rendition would be, "Dick Vitale recorded thirty-seven thirty-second ads for ESPN." "37" is one modifier; "30-second" is a separate one. This is hard, grammatically. Really, I can explain this to people who were born in the U.S. and have been writing professionally for 20 years and many of them have a hard time understanding it.

Here's another (non-sports) example. Assume these facts:

• I have a cat, Mischa (I do, in fact, have a cat named after Mischa Barton).
• Mischa has long hair.
• Mischa is fourteen years old.

"Long-haired" is one compound modifier; "fourteen-year-old" is a separate one. As such, they don't get hyphenated in one long construction. A grammatically correct description would be, "Mischa is a long-haired fourteen-year-old cat." "Mischa is a fourteen-year-old-long-haired cat" isn't correct, because the fact that she's 14 is a separate concept than the fact that she's long-haired. (Another correct sentence, which an American would almost never write unless they were trying to be humorous by being unnecessarily convoluted (the humorous newspaper columnist Dave Barry is the best example I know of someone who does this), would be, "Mischa is a Julietdeltalima-owned fourteen-year-old long-haired cat."

Now, to the question of football goals that occur at the 22'32" mark: Based on MOS:NUM and reasonable avoidance of ponderous grammatical constructions, I'd write "Zinedine Zidane scored a goal at 22'32" (or 22:32; I am unfamiliar with the nuances of MOS:FOOTY regarding punctuation for game-time references). If you were to write out the whole thing, it would correctly be "Zinedine Zidane scored a goal at twenty-two minutes, thirty-two seconds," or, equally correctly, "... twenty-two minutes and thirty-two seconds".

Please don't ever hesitate to ask me questions like this. They make me really happy to read, and to have the privilege of answering. All the best! - Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:40, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

In appreciation

		The Guidance Barnstar
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of your having a sense of direction. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:12, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Ernest Simoni

I see you have been involved in discussions on the article Catholic Church. At present some editors are resisting fixing of the links so they match the article. One place where tere has been especially hard headed insistence on using a link to a redirect is on the article on Ernest Simoni.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:41, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your edit to Marguerite Durand

I found the following article in Encyclopedia.com, which asserts that both Marguerite Durand and her half-brother Charles were born out of wedlock: https://www.encyclopedia.com/women/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/durand-marguerite-1864-1936 Given that it includes the information about her half-brother and also cites several sources at the end of the article it seems unlikely that the article's author is simply repeating information taken from Wikipedia.

Whether this merits restoring that bit of information to the article I leave up to you. Ormewood (talk) 19:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

@Ormewood: Yes, I had seen that one mention, but could not find any other significant mention. I _am_ down on IPs (and after all a vandal IP edit drew my attention elsewhere in that article) and so really wondered about the original addition. (Which took 3 additional edits by others to approach reasonable English)

Indeed, now that I check that broken English geolocates to France. Which put me in mind to check fr:Marguerite Durand (féministe). I see nothing there about this. So I think I'll leave at that, that the French article about a French notable says nothing.

One thing in sometimes short supply at Wikipedia is patience. Let the truth accrete! Shenme (talk) 23:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you

..for this [1] - GizzyCatBella🍁 08:17, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Henry Baring

I've taken a look at your edit, and support it upon closer examination of the refs provided (which I failed to do earlier, my mistake). Hopefully this should clear up any issues my edits may have caused, though if you feel the need to contact me for any reason please do so. Regards, Freezingwedge (talk) 16:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Schrodinger gender?

Oh I didn't know that the machine sometimes gives my gender as female. I must have set it in a moment of playfulness ... and I don't know how to reset it. Makes a change, I guess, for a bloke to be assumed to be a female. I would reset it for you if you tell me how <rant>although I personally think that we get over excited about the gender of our editors when the really important item is the gender bias of the articles.</rant> All the best (pronounced Roger) aka Victuallers (talk) 13:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC) P.s. is Shenme pronounced She'&/n'me? :-)

@Victuallers:

Pretty much like "shem-muh", it is a Chinese word zh:wikt:什么 for the question word "what?" among other usages. Un-grandiose that. Predictive also. :-)

But that was an issue for those people I mentioned: each time "bloke assumed to be a female", and horrible torsion of politeness then general nastiness ensued, at least 15 years ago. So disappointing when it "macht nichts"!

Click on "Preferences" at top of window. Then scroll down a bit more than one full screen, past "Basic information" to "Internationalisation" and section "Gender used in messages:". Of the three choices I think you have the middle one selected, 'feminine'? The upper one "gender-neutral" is the default, but that somehow must have gotten changed. Pick which one you want then click the "Save" button at bottom of window.

If you want to test, the only way I know of is to edit some page, add

{{gender:user|m_out|f_out|u_out}}

to the text then do a "Show preview". I see "u_out" from that, showing that neither the male alternative "m_out" nor the female alternative "f_out" are selected. Kinda weird discovering that you can't easily see what other people see from you! Shenme (talk) 03:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

I think it is now set to neutral now (Schrodingers cat box closed). Impressed by your skills with the tools. @Shenme: <--- find out. Victuallers (talk) 07:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for catching my missing words at WBPX-TV!

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:53, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Tea for a fellow gnome whose user pages made me smile :)   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  19:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Seeking clarification

Hello,

I'm responding to the message you left on my talk page. You mentioned you "have grave doubts about most of" the sources I added on the article for David Gillespie. What exactly are your concerns? Are there any specific sources that you find an issue with? Aneirinn (talk) 09:56, 26 November 2024 (UTC)