Tgeorgescu, you might check this new user out as a suspected sock of banned user User:GoogleMeNowPlease?Achar Sva (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2020

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JavaHurricane 13:37, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please elaborate RooneysBaldHead (talk) 13:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Because I'm editing the islamic perspective which is being written from a Christian perspective. I'm not editing any Christian stuff RooneysBaldHead (talk) 13:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:47, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RooneysBaldHead (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The Islamic perspective section of various pages are being written from a Christian perspective. Merely rewriting stuff from an islamic perspective warrants an indefinite ban? What kind of bigotry is this. Please unban and let me rewrite the Islamic perspective of Jesus and Mary from an Islamic perspective. Please and thanks

Decline reason:

You need to convince us you will edit in a collaborative way and understand how to resolve disputes. Yamla (talk) 13:59, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You also explicitly need to make a statement as to whether or not you have any other accounts here (and if so, list those accounts). --Yamla (talk) 14:00, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RooneysBaldHead (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not sure how I could convince you I would resove disputes. I never intended to vandalise any article. If I wanted to, I could have simply edited the Christian view of Mary and Jesus and simply adjusted into the Islamic view. Christian users on here are editing the Islamic perspective of Jesus and writing it from a Christian perspective. How does that make sense? I understand Prophet Muhammad is not of great significance to them but writing stuff like he copied stuff from the Bible doesn't really belong to the Islamic perspective does it? If anything it belongs to the page dedicated to criticism of Islam and Prophet Muhammad and not on Islamic perspective of Virgin birth or Mary. No, I don't have any other Wikipedia account. I used to edit stuff anonymously before I made this one RooneysBaldHead (talk) 14:11, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This doesn't have to do with whether something is written from an Islamic perspective or a Christian perspective or any other perspective, this has to do with your behavior and lack of collaboration with other editors. You've also made personal attacks, as noted below. I am not sufficiently assured that you will stop these problematic behaviors if unblocked, and as such I must decline your request. Until you can tell us how you will work towards resolving disputes and collaborate with others in a civil manner, you won't be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 14:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You there? RooneysBaldHead (talk) 14:29, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Who were you referring to in this post?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:38, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply