Rnorve

Welcome!

Hello, Rnorve, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Deb 17:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Nice to see you adding all that material on Gilsland. I went there just the other day, but I don't know much about it. Deb 17:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Another welcome

Hello Rnorve. Thanks for all the great edits you are making to the Cumbria articles. Keep up the wonderful work. Cheers. Tynetrekker (talk) 04:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

St. Magdalene's Church

Hello. Moving the page from "St. Magdalene's Church" to the place you moved it was not appropriate. From your comment, I understand your sentiment that there are many churches with the same name, but in naming pages, the first available name is used then any subsequent pages have disambiguation. For example, if a chain of stores opened in Dallas named "Woo-Hoo" and an article was created, the name of the article would be simply "Woo-Hoo" if there were no existing articles by that name. If a company developed a software by the same name and an article was created after the previous, then the title of that article would be "Woo-Hoo (software)."

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia is not a directory. Cheers! Stella ^BATPHONE_GROOVES 02:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

That is actually not at all how we decide which article has the disambiguating parenthesis, and I have no idea what the "not a directory" policy has to do with this. There's a disambiguation page at St. Mary Magdalene's Church and a whole bunch of churches there, so I think Rnorve's move was correct, although there might be other issues. Why not add St. Mary Magdalene's Church, Gilsland to St. Mary Magdalene's Church? —User talk:ErikHaugen 04:33, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

St Mary Magdalene's Church, Gilsland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Icy // ♫ 04:16, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey! I accepted your submission because it was of interest and notable enough to be worth including. You seem to be relatively familiar with the Cumbria area, so I trust that you know enough about it to write a pretty good article about this local landmark. However, the one thing I wasn't sure about was the amount of references. I think that as you continue to work on this article, which you will of course, right? -- you should definitely work on adding citations -- WP:Referencing for beginners is a good place to start if you're lost. Anyways, that's definitely something you want to get started on, or it might get thrown to the people down at WP:Articles for Deletion, which is somewhere you don't want to go. Anyway, congratulations, and good luck. Icy // ♫ 04:19, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a Bunch

Maybe if Wikipedia moderators focused on the utility of articles rather than petty regulations, and actually understood the regulations they apply, a lot of the above verbiage, some of which has been deleted, might have been avoided.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rnorve. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rnorve. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)