April 2020

edit

Hi, I'm JazzClam, I looked through the Teahouse today and noticed you placed a question regarding whether or not all the members of the german parliament are notable enough to have their own wikipedia article, Since I am not a Teahouse host I could not answer your question in the teahouse but I'd like to give you my take on it. I think that if a member of parliament has enough information on him or her to warrant a full wikipedia article they are notable enough. In my limited experience on wikipedia the notability of a person matters when placing them on an article that is not specifically about them or a group they are in. For example, if I wanted to put youtubers that play a video game on that video game's wikipedia page, they would have to be notable, as the game's page is not about them or a group they are in. If you were to make a wikipedia page for them however, their notability does not matter, since it is their own wikipedia page. So in this case, their notability does not matter as if it is a list of all the members of parliament, they are in that group and need to be included. But do all members need their own page? Technically yes, they all could, but would be very hard to include large thorough pages on all of them, so perhaps only the particularly notable or famous ones would get a page while all others would be on a list. Note that I am relatively new and this is just my take on it, always listen to teahouse hosts or more experienced editors before me. JazzClam (talk) 14:32, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vegetarianism by country, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Material scientist, I am new in Wikipedia and I have edited the article based on my experiences as a vegetarian in Bangladesh . Also I belong to the Hindu community there. So I think my article does not contain any misinformation. I can not mention any source as there is no effective source online and offline currently to verify my statement. I will implore you to judge my logics and work accordingly. Thank you.  Ppt2003 (talk) 11:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Sjö. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 07:07, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Evariste Ndayishimiye

edit
 

The article Evariste Ndayishimiye has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 09:49, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dieudonné Nahimana for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dieudonné Nahimana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dieudonné Nahimana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 09:10, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dieudonné Nahimana moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Dieudonné Nahimana, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 09:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dieudonné Nahimana (May 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ppt2003! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Patriotic Movement for Democracy and Development moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Patriotic Movement for Democracy and Development, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KylieTastic (talk) 09:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dieudonné Nahimana (May 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 10:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dieudonné Nahimana (May 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Just constantly resubmitting without improvement is considered WP:GAMING the system. Candidates for office aren't notable. No other form of notability is established. For all these reasons, this article is rejected.
Sulfurboy (talk) 10:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Butore

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Joseph Butore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HeartGlow30797 (talk) 09:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
 
Here, enjoy some cookies!  

Hi Ppt2003! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! HeartGlow30797 (talk) 09:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your article

edit

Hellp Ppt, and thank you for your article on Joseph Butore! You'll see that I have taken the references to the French Wikipedia and changed them to a reliable source, since Wikipedia isn't a reliable source. If you have any questions about editing come ask at the Teahouse :) – Thjarkur (talk) 10:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Ppt2003! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, DIEUDONNE NAHIMANA, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Ppt2003. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 16:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.Reply

Constitution of Kiribati moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Constitution of Kiribati, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 03:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Ppt2003! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Finland postal strikes controversy 2019, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kira Rudyk

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kira Rudyk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Numan765 (talk) 13:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Andrew nyr. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Institute of Modern Languages (Dhaka), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 06:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hi Ppt2003! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Interstellarity (talk) 12:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Re: Jair Bolsonaro

edit

Not necessarily. First, the information is dated and not correct. At 15 July 2019, Adelio was acquitted, true. However, in the following day, Bolsonaro announced he wouldn't appeal the decision (the brazilian Public Prosecutor's Office made a similar declaration) and the case was considered closed, and it has been for nearly two years by now (source, in portuguese). Just a few days ago, prosecutors made public their final report on the case, but neither Bolsonaro nor any member of his administration have made any comments about it.

So, to sum up, the information you posted was outdated, and not entirely accurate. At best, the article should mentioned that the guy is serving his sentence in a hospital for mentally ill people and that the case is closed. Coltsfan (talk) 16:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2019 Botswana general election (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to SADC
Democratic backsliding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Justice and Development Party
Presidency of Jair Bolsonaro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lancet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mario Ponce

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mario Ponce requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Havechin (talk) 17:53, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Ppt2003. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 17:57, 22 May 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.Reply

Aleksey Vagov moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Aleksey Vagov, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 10:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aleksey Vagov (May 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~Amkgp 11:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Ppt2003

Thank you for creating Isaac Alzamora.

User:Lefcentreright, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, I've added some tags and did a bit of a copy editing. Please add additional citations and maybe an infobox? If you want to, you can translate the Spanish version of the article (w:es:Isaac Alzamora) and maybe get some tips/info from it?

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 11:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Vice Presidents of Peru

edit

Hi. I noticed, while looking at your article on Francisco Garmendia Puertolas, that you're interested in Peruvian VPs as a series but are struggling with sources. There is a study on them by someone called Freddy Centurion, which you may find useful: it's available online as a pdf. I've added it to Garmendia Puertolas as a ref - see what you think. Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 16:28, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aleksey Vagov (May 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JavaHurricane 11:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Ppt2003. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 11:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Ppt2003! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, member of parliament, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Ppt2003! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, adding photo, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Ppt2003! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, wikimedia commons, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2019 Botswana general election (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to SADC
Democratic backsliding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Justice and Development Party

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Ppt2003! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Aleksey Vagov, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You are invited to read the section at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia#Translating_from_other_language_Wikimedia_projects and also Wikipedia:Translation#How_to_translate. Appreciate your work but you need to mark translated pages from the spanish edition of Wikipedia. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately you seem to continue translating articles from the spanish edition without correctly marking the contribution - please read the above passages and follow those instructions. Marking at the Talk Page is not sufficient and translating without marking could be treatet like a possible copyright violation. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Ppt2003

Thank you for creating Lino Alarco Brediñana.

User:Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add clear references.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 20:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Ppt2003! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, programming, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Georgian parliamentary election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United National Movement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Assembly of Gabon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Democrats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Updates

edit

Hello. When you do updates like this, please ensure you update every line of the table. As it stands, you did not update the number of invalid votes or the total number of votes, meaning the table no longer adds up. Also, you did not update the infobox, so the two are now mismatched.

Updates should be done in full. If you do not have time to do a full update, it is best not to do it at all. Thanks, Number 57 17:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Georgian parliamentary election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tesla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 17 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Probir Roy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salt Lake.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patriotic Movement for Democracy and Development (October 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:34, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

CommanderWaterford's block

edit

The discussion of the block and reasons for it are spelt out pretty clearly on User talk:CommanderWaterford. Best, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Deepfriedokra:, Thank you sir. I was shocked by Floquenbeams misconduct, and I am gratified by your willingness to engage in a constructive discussion on the matter. Thanks Sir. Ppt2003 (talk) 10:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Dieudonné Nahimana

edit
 

Hello, Ppt2003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dieudonné Nahimana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Aleksey Vagov

edit
 

Hello, Ppt2003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aleksey Vagov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

South Dakota House of Representatives
added links pointing to Chris Johnson, Sydney Davis and Mary Fitzgerald
South Dakota Senate
added a link pointing to David Wheeler

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Ppt2003! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, State legislatures, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Idaho House of Representatives
added links pointing to Brandon Mitchell and David Cannon
South Dakota House of Representatives
added a link pointing to Chris Johnson

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ppt2003 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here : Caught by an open proxy,which I am not. My ip address:https://www.whatismyip.com/ip/118.179.42.161/

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November

edit

Hello! Please make sure that you're including all of the necessary information in your references. Using a bare URL without additional information can mean the source will be lost if the link ever stops working. Also, make sure you're not using opinionated language like "humiliating" in articles. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 07:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ok, Thanks. I will follow ur suggestions buddy. Ppt2003 (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply