User talk:Perseus71/Archives/2010/March

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Okay

I have just acquired several volumes of the German official history and an interesting (albeit general) book of the Jagdwaffe. This maybe of use. Dapi89 (talk) 14:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Just to clarify, the deal with organisational issues! Dapi89 (talk) 17:05, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Luftwaffe North (Ostland) detachment (Luftflotte 1, Baltic Area)

Hello Perseus71. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Luftwaffe North (Ostland) detachment (Luftflotte 1, Baltic Area), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article needs to be kept to preserve contribution history following merge (as per note on page). Thank you. Nancy ^talk 18:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Jagdgeschwader 11

I haven't really looked at the article to see what sorts of new information and cites you've added because I'm more focused on the bogus citations that are still there. Forex, Caldwell, p. 80 is cited for things that have nothing to do with that page. I'm very tempted to fail it again for the exact same reasons as I did before, but I'll give you a chance to correct the citation problems. Please limit the citations for a given statement or fact to those that support that statement or fact.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

It was not his fault it was a dodgy cite techy problem. Dapi89 (talk) 18:24, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

I was just saying that the citations were not working The linkes had the correct page numbers but for some reason they were not coming out correctly in the cite refs at the bottom. Sturm' thought they were deliberate. Dapi89 (talk) 12:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

I think you might want to check everyone. I only checked some. Dapi89 (talk) 14:20, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Organization of Luftwaffe

My understanding is that even at B-class the source of information even on tables should be evident. MisterBee1966 (talk) 15:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Its okay. OKL has its own article anyway. Perhaps anything on the Fliegerkorps, its role or relationship with the Luftflotte. Dapi89 (talk) 16:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Are you sure Luftflotte were operational instruments? I was under the impression they were to carry out strategic ops. Its formations FLK and FLDs were the op components. Just a thought. Dapi89 (talk) 13:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator election

Thank you for your support MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Finger Four Formation

Have a look at Werner Mölders. I think the information is relevant so it should be part of the Luftwaffe articles where it makes sense. MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

I think I would try to expand the finger 4 article. Mölders had some impact on its development but so did Günther Lützow. So best keep it in one place MisterBee1966 (talk) 19:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)