OrebroVi

Welcome!

Hi OrebroVi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed restriction

Hi OrebroVi, Special:Diff/1266883214 and Special:Diff/1266879719 seem to be incompatible with the "500 edits and an account age of 30 days" restriction described in the blue box above. I have thus undone these edits. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing this out—will defer from making edits in those space per ECR. OrebroVi (talk) 00:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

January 2025

Hello, I'm Cyrobyte. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sam Harris seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cyrobyte (talk) 00:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sam Harris. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Cyrobyte (talk) 00:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

No commentary/personal analysis was provided. An atheist figure being anti-Islam, and having written a book in against Islam, justifies the title anti-Islam. Note that from my very first edit on the page I sourced the 'anti-Islam' label. OrebroVi (talk) 00:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

To add: your disingenuous assumptions of bad faith or adding personal analysis in cited edits are unwelcome. See WP:AGF. OrebroVi (talk) 00:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, I still had this page on my watchlist from sending the messages above. If I may. WP:BLPRESTORE applies, so the content may not be restored until a consensus is found (preferably on the article's talk page, not here). WP:BURDEN requires direct support from a source, which would only be the case for a label like "Anti-Islam" if that term is actually used by reliable secondary sources themselves, not with quotes or in reference distancing themselves from the term. For example, the Guardian article used to support the label "Anti-Islam" appears to neutrally describe accusations of Islamophobia from a distance rather than making such statements itself. That would be required, however. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:58, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

(And for the sake of completeness, no accusation of bad faith seems to have been made above, and describing a personal interpretation of a source as original research doesn't imply that there was an intent to do so, or that original research was added with the purpose of damaging the encyclopedia. That would be bad-faith/vandalism, but it hasn't been alleged above unless I'm overlooking something.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:00, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

@ToBeFree Thanks for chipping in. I'll leave the current reverted version as @Cyrobyte eventually gave a fair justification and the Guardian source does seem to distance itself from directly calling Harris anti-Islam. Good to know about Wikipedia:BLPRESTORE though. OrebroVi (talk) 03:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Ah perfect. Thanks and no worries! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

You're making quite a few sloppy MOS:CAPFRAG edits in quick succession, despite citing the guideline in edit summaries removing full stops where they should appear as seen for example in this edit. This kind of editing is a common WP:PGAME tactic, which is hopefully not what you are doing. Either way you should probably reread the guideline and slow down a bit. --TylerBurden (talk) 16:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, if these are made with the intention of reaching 500 edits, please don't. I think in the last few years I have seen exactly one editor actually reaching the limit productively in short time, but they had been around for multiple years before and then took multiple days of intensive Wikipedia work to meticulously scan articles for actual errors and to fix them. In most cases, people fail to actually improve articles on this journey, and the extended-confirmed permission is then quickly revoked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:02, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Will avoid making these small edits then, especially since I see the issues with the prior MOS:CAPFRAG edits. OrebroVi (talk) 19:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

PROD

FYI, RE: your PROD at Jihobbyist, you can only PROD articles with no previous PRODs or AfD discussions. Iskandar323 (talk) 04:45, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Removing the PROD now. Thanks for informing. OrebroVi (talk) 04:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)