User talk:Nford24/Archive2
Hi, you updated an article on the RV Triton, just an update for you - she's now moored up in the Fal river in Cornwall - by the looks of it she's been there a while!
-->hello Nathaniel.
You updated my Wikipedia page: AVM E J STRINGER RAF. Thank you for your accurate editing, everything is correct. There is an omission, however: I was awarded the OBE in the QBHL of 2003. I am not sure how you would verify this but your sources appear to be impeccable!
September 2014
edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Order of the Thistle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ** [[Secretary]] [[Elizabeth Roads]], {{post-nominals|country=GBR|sep=,|LVO} ([[Snawdoun Herald]], [[Lyon Clerk and Keeper of the Records]]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Crown Honours Lists, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cyclopaedia.de/wiki/New_Years_Honours.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, it does look like the bot is confused, as it looks like you adapted content from a related Wikipedia article for this. That's fine, as it is free, though attribution is required according to the license. It looks like that content was from the lead of New Year Honours. If you can confirm this, I'll take care of the attribution. CrowCaw 21:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- Yes it is, thankyou. Though I actually blanked that page and redirected it to Crown Honours to clean up the large amount of unnecessary pages. Someone else has reverted my clean-up. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 02:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
editGreetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Special Honours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mearns. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 1
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Special Honours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clifton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
You may be interested...
editI've created a page for Operation Okra. Feel free to contribute. -Keepdry (talk) 08:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Heads up. Suggest you have a look at:
- User_talk:AusTerrapin#Bars_to_CSC_&_DSC (and following sub-sections)
- DSC & Bar (Australia) ribbon Revision history
- CSC & Bar Revision history
- etc.
Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:45, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Query
editLove your post-nom template! How can we remove the underscores though? I remain as ever, yours, etc. (Mr) Gareth E Kegg (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC) Esq.
- Hey. thanks. Do you mean the comma's? It's probably better having them bu tif you wish to remove them, then just take out the 'sep=,' from the template. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 19:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- I never really know Wiki technical language, but as you hover over the post noms you can see the page title with_under_scores_like_this. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 19:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- O, I cannot see that coming up on my computer sorry. I'm not too sure how to fix that. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 00:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- I never really know Wiki technical language, but as you hover over the post noms you can see the page title with_under_scores_like_this. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 19:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux
edit
|
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Template:Post-nominals/CAN
editWhy does a direct link to Order of Merit violate . If there were different classes and each had a section in the target then I could see linking to that but in this case there isn't. Cheers. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- WP:POSTNOM wants the full honour to be present when you mouse over the link. Having 'OBE' for example as a post-nom, when you mouse over it, it should read 'Officer of the Order of the British Empire' and not just 'Order of the British Empire'. Though it maybe a template, it still comes under the same user guidelines of just spelling it out i.e. OBE . Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 11:51, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- However, postnom does not state that. It may well be that is the intention but without it specifically stating that there is no way that an editor is going to figure it out. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 12:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 2 November
edit Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Kerry Sanderson page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
edit
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You seem to be deeply involved in a revert war regarding MOS/flags on a number of articles. Please find somewhere to discuss these issues, rather than continuing to revert. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 23:35, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- I find stage that I am the only one to receive this notice A fluffernutter is a sandwich!. I therefore consider it a rude slap in the face. The other editors involved have reverted my edits repeatedly for breaching various 'rules', though I have accommodated each 'rule' accordingly and as my last edits stands does not cause any 'rule' breaches. I honestly believe there is quite a bit of WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 06:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Deadlink
edithttp://www.cadetnet.gov.au/aac/unitsites/70acu/Resourcearea/Documents/Cadet Instructor's Handbook - Customs and Traditions, 2006.pdf no longer provides access to the Handbook. Do you have / can you find a URL that does? (I haven't been able to - yet.) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- P.S. It's referenced on List of Australian Army brigadiers and List of Australian Army generals (and possibly other places, too.) Pdfpdf (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah the website was updated again. What specifically did it reference? Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 21:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Cadet Instructor's Handbook - Customs and Traditions, 2006.pdf Pdfpdf (talk) 13:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
- No joy? Pdfpdf (talk) 04:12, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Afraid not. It does not appear to exist any longer, it may have been retitled or merged with another ABR. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 06:38, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oh well. I'm fairly confident that it won't be the cause of the end of like as we know it on Planet Earth. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 07:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
editThe Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
editThe Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
editNominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
P,S.
editBelated Season's Greetings! Pdfpdf (talk) 10:40, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Andrew Willis (RAN officer) for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Willis (RAN officer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Willis (RAN officer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
The Beatles Invite
edit
|
Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us. | ||||||
Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet!
| |||||||
.jpg){kind=link}
_ribbon.png&action=history){kind=link}
Template:Infobox military operation
editFYI - no action requested or expected. (I just thought you may be interested to be kept "in-the-loop".) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 04:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox military operation has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox operational plan. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 January 16#Template:Infobox military operation - PanchoS (talk) 21:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
but he is wrong
edit(Context: revert last two edits, Both AK & AC post-nominals are not used, I know it was in the PM's list but he is wrong.)
Oh yes - there are MANY who would agree with you that the mad monk is "wrong", (and not all of them are members of the Labor party ... ).
But getting back on topic, Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- His list (showing the dual post-nominal's) is certainly wrong, but in a recent act of his, he did the right thing, though the Queen's Birthday List would have gone down a little better with the bogans. ;) Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 21:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Ummm. Maybe.
- It's probably best to keep my mouth closed - that way I can't put my foot in it. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:32, 27 February 2015 (UTC)- Though I do agree with your decision and I wont be appealing it, I think you'll find the other editor has pretty much ignored it JamesBWatson - See 109.246.133.107. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 15:29, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- You are perfectly right. I have reset the block to its original length, blocked the new IP address, reverted all the block-evading edits that had not already been suprceded by other editors, and warned the editor that further block-evasion may lead to a much longer block. Please feel welcome to let me know if you see any more trouble from the same editor. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Honours
editHi Nford24 - I see above mention that AK & AC post-nominals are not used, I know it was in the PM's list but he is wrong - problem is that they can be used not that aren't used. Strict difference - likewise with Dr Conn's decorations they are to be worn in precedence of date of award. Please advise - many thanks M Mabelina (talk) 06:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- That is a different matter, that was resolved by a group of top editors. In Australia there is an order of wear issued by the Governor-General (http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/honours/awards/docs/order_of_wearing.pdf). Honours are not worn in order of the date of award at all. Please provide a ref to prove otherwise. Mabelina If I have need it to be revert again, I'll report it to ANI. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 07:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- My point is that it is English Wikipedia (or at least that is what is says on the tin) - so now you are saying that it is Aussie English Wiki - in the UK what I said above is correct - please report it - there seems to be a massive divergence of views here M Mabelina (talk) 07:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- English, refers to the language. While Conn is an Australian citizen, his honours will officialy reflect the Australian order of wear. Should he ever decide to change his rack around, that's great for him, but the official order of wear will always be there. WP is about the facts, I have seen your having problems with other editors, about factual information on WP, why don't you realise that this is factual? Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 07:10, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes I am having huge problems with other editors which is much to my regret (I almost wish I never got involved) - but having discussed it with an Admin in UK there does seem to be a lot of wrangling inter-Wiki about language & who takes precedence. My sole endeavours have been to introduce facts & now (without asking for it) I have become embroiled in MOS or whatever you call it. M Mabelina (talk) 07:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC) PS. I just want to stick to the facts - since you are an Aussie please provide links to the dates of Dr Conn's awards of the two tenuous decorations.... (Even calling him Dr Conn seems to be out of order in Wiki world)... Await yours M Mabelina (talk) 07:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- & just a quick nod to the great Richie (to lighten the tone): "McGrath is out for two, just 98 short of his century!"
- Yes I am having huge problems with other editors which is much to my regret (I almost wish I never got involved) - but having discussed it with an Admin in UK there does seem to be a lot of wrangling inter-Wiki about language & who takes precedence. My sole endeavours have been to introduce facts & now (without asking for it) I have become embroiled in MOS or whatever you call it. M Mabelina (talk) 07:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC) PS. I just want to stick to the facts - since you are an Aussie please provide links to the dates of Dr Conn's awards of the two tenuous decorations.... (Even calling him Dr Conn seems to be out of order in Wiki world)... Await yours M Mabelina (talk) 07:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- btw who are these "top editors" - please advise - many thanks. M Mabelina (talk) 07:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- If you have a look through the history of his awards, you'll find I never added those dates, I left them out. I will only add dates, if I can find a reliable reference for the dates of awards, you'll also see that last time I revert your edit, I removed the dates as well. The Australian Defence Medal & Anniversary of National Service 1951–1972 Medal are simple service medals issued by the Department of Defence, because they are not decorations, their award dates are never made public. These medals are awarded through the post. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 07:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- AusTerrapin, Pdfpdf & myself (Though I don't regard myself as a top editor). Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 07:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Blimey - "through the post" - doesn't sound very elevated at all (& perhaps worthy of review by AUS Govt). Anyway, Dr Conn received upon institution these medals so the dates are crystal clear (ie 2001 & 2006).. This MOS is clearly not going to go away (& I don't mean by my interventions - just from what I glean from UK sources) - language phraseology is becoming ever less universal & whilst I love the way Wiki puts most things certain formal and/or historical matters are difficult to translate even from English, well ... to English! M Mabelina (talk) 07:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Conn was eligible for the awards upon their creation, but can you provide a ref that he was awarded them in those years?
- No unfort I can't all I have seen is him wearing them - I was hoping you could do the tech stuff... M Mabelina (talk) 08:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- This is one of the latest pictures of him from November last year (http://www.kiamaindependent.com.au/story/2676162/jamberoos-emma-blunden-picks-up-st-john-ambulance-gong/). His St John service medal is in the pre-1992 order of wear. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 08:35, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Good info Nford24 - thanks. So, looks like Dr Conn didn't receive his Anniversary of National Service Medal till after 2009? M Mabelina (talk) 08:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
edit
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cate Blanchett, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Lapadite (talk) 09:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
There was a reason given, It's the second times I've removed that false and misleading content from that page. The "post-nominal" used in the article is made-up and therefore unrecognised in Australia. See Australian Honours System for further information. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 15:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Nford24, "false and misleading content" - I suggest you read the lead of the article and/or the Awards and achievements section. Post-nominal or honorary titles do not need to be from the country the subject was born in. See Template:Infobox person, Title of honor, Post-nominal letters. Unless you want to be blocked for edit warring (or disruptive editing) again, I suggest you stop doing it. Lapadite (talk) 21:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- I suggest you take a look at WP:POSTNOM before reverting it again.Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 01:10, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Brisbane Meetup
editHi there! I'm dropping you this notice as you've indicated at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane that you are interested in attending a Wiki meetup in Brisbane. Assuming significant interest, I'm organising an event for August 22 at the SLQ Café in South Brisbane, and we'd love for you to come along. A list of people interested in coming, and a discussion space has been created at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/8. Hope to see you there! Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:59, 4 August 2015 (UTC).
Brisbane Meetup
editHi there! I'm dropping you this notice as you've indicated on your userpage that you're a Wikipedian in the Brisbane area. Assuming significant interest, I'm organising an event for August 22 at the SLQ Café in South Brisbane, and we'd love for you to come along. A list of people interested in coming, and a discussion space has been created at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/8. Hope to see you there! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Brisbane. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery
The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
editGreetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Straw poll on the use of The Rt. Hon.
editHello. I have created a straw poll on whether The Right Honourable should be used in infoboxes for all Barons, Viscounts and Earls or just for Privy Counsellors. The poll is here. I wish that you could give your opinion there and maybe comment. --Editor FIN (talk) 05:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Australian Defence Force Cadets Logo.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Australian Defence Force Cadets Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
editOn behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Brisbane Meetup in January 2016
editHi there! I'm dropping you this notice as you've indicated on your userpage that you're a Wikipedian in the Brisbane area. To celebrate fifteen years of Wikipedia, we are holding a celebration in Brisbane on the 16th of January and you are invited! For further information, and to register your interest, please see our meetup page. Hope to see you there!
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Brisbane. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery.
Honours & postnoms
editHi Nford24 - firstly let me wish you a very Happy New Year. I listed Sir James Dyson's postnoms for a very specific reason. I am also pleased that you show interest in this matter & hope we can reach accord for Wiki's sake. It is customary but not obligatory for honourees to list a couple of their most prestigious awards, otherwise their names would become unwieldy to say the least! Obviously there is no precedent for Dyson's use accordingly because his OM was only announced in the New Years Honours. I think it is better for Wiki to desist from reinventing language style to fit its self-devised parameters but if you have other thoughts please let me know. Many thanks. Best M Mabelina (talk) 04:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Happy New Years to you too. I understand this, I was a witness to the decision to omit the postnominals of the Duke of Edinburgh & Prince of Wales. Dyson only has four postnominals, which is below average for people with Wikipedia pages. Taking that into consideration, he has the postnomianls 'FRS FREng', I don't see why the 'CBE' (being a higher postnominal) should be excluded for the 'FRS'. If any postnomianls should be excluded (and I don't agree with any being excluded) the FRS should be omited for the CBE. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 11:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Nford24: well it is a moot point & a matter of personal preference, but since rarely does anyone wish to be known by umpteen letters after their name it is a matter of discretion as how to apply protocol in this regard - I could perhaps create a page or add to one (if such a relevant article already exists)? insofar as I know this matter can cause confusion, and resultant issues, for Wikipedians and it would be good to get it sorted out. Of course, another issue is that protocol differs from country to country, and whilst I can speak with absolute certainty about customary practice in the UK (always deferring to the holder's personal preference of course, so long as not contravening established formal guidelines) I shouldn't wish to venture to set down guidelines for other countries, although I do have some working knowledge about this.
- I understand that you are also conversant with such matters so the question is how to marry Wiki infoboxes & other like formulaic templates with normal protocol so as to avoid providing opportunities for lazy journalists (or others - but I trust you know what I mean?) to put in print an inadvertently Wiki-created linguistic style, which can then get cited back as "evidence" by future Wiki editors! - in other words thus creating an ever increasing downwards spiral, ie. a departure from what is correct form!!). Times and social customs change of course, but this is why Wiki is far better placed than most to keep up-to-date on such matters - as long as it sets off on the right footing!
- Now with regard to the moot point of FRS over CBE, you absolutely correct to say that CBE is "higher" than FRS, but then OM accords no precedence either. Generally accepted custom, especially in the case of FRS (& FBA, FRSL, eg.) is to use the "highest" national honour in conjunction with FRS. So put simply, the best national honour with the best Fellowship. I can continue on this further as need be but perhaps you could let me know your further thoughts so far? Much appreciated - best M Mabelina (talk) 12:58, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
PS. what is the relevance of PE 121 Personnel Request Form may I ask?
- Now with regard to the moot point of FRS over CBE, you absolutely correct to say that CBE is "higher" than FRS, but then OM accords no precedence either. Generally accepted custom, especially in the case of FRS (& FBA, FRSL, eg.) is to use the "highest" national honour in conjunction with FRS. So put simply, the best national honour with the best Fellowship. I can continue on this further as need be but perhaps you could let me know your further thoughts so far? Much appreciated - best M Mabelina (talk) 12:58, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Based on that, I'd say you're looking at trying to make a new consensus for change on current Wiki policies? I personally tend to agree with actual fact over convenient fact, so I would be in favour of including all of his postnominals, as opposed to the highest ones (honour & fellowship). The PE121 form is used alot in my line of work, it's used by the Department of Defence in Australia as a personnel request form (for promotions, meeting appointments, qualification's, awards, Leave etc.). The form is printed on green paper & is referred too as a "Green Grenade", I have quite a few cross my desk on a weekly basis.
- I may not be on Wiki much for the next few days, due to work, so I might not reply for a while on occasion. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 18:45, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Good to hear back from you Nford24 & all that me and others are requesting from Wiki is clarity of current policy..
- Should this not be possible, please devise soonest so as to remedy - many thanks. M Mabelina (talk) 05:14, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
PS. are you sending a PE121 Form, or was that a side issue?
- I may not be on Wiki much for the next few days, due to work, so I might not reply for a while on occasion. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 18:45, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- No, They cross my desk as a head of department. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 07:06, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Nford24: good - one less complication then! I'm still mightily confused about what Wiki is trying to achieve ref. titles, styles & postnoms. Nobody seems to be prepared to stand up & be counted. Let's put it very simply: if Wiki is intent on not including honorific prefixes as is its wont, then let's rationalise peers accordingly - does this make sense? RSVP. M Mabelina (talk) 07:12, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:British Empire Medal (Mil. div.).jpg
edit.jpg){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading File:British Empire Medal (Mil. div.).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Nford24
editThe list is in absolutely no way correct in 2016 and the assertion that it should reflect their term in office is random and unjustified (globally accepted? where?). Calling him "Sir Terry Lewis" merely serves to make Wikipedia look like we're both using sources from when I was in pre-school and on top of that are pretty incompetent at basic research. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- As I said, have a look at Chief of the Defence Force (Australia) list, and then get consensus to change everything. What your trying to suggest, is equivalent to arguing that Prince William was Duke of Cambridge from birth or that Sir David Attenborough was a knight from birth. The lists reflect the titles held at the end of their tenur, not those from after or before. Terry Lewis was a Knight Bachelor during his tenure, and he was refered to as 'Sir Terry Lewis'. Your essentially trying to rewrite history by your statement The Drover's Wife. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 04:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not trying to rewrite history, I'm trying to state definitive fact. Terry Lewis is not correctly addressed as "Sir Terry Lewis", and hasn't been since I was very small. Therefore, in what is just a list of people to have held a role, he should not be addressed as something that it is not currently correct to address him is. The David Attenborough or Prince William arguments don't make sense because they are those things now, and it is correct to refer to them as those things now, whereas it is manifestly not here.
- You didn't have a consensus to define the list in that way to begin with. You're welcome to get one, but in the meantime Wikipedia needs to stick with what is verifiable fact. The Drover's Wife (talk) 04:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
You keep referring me to Chief of the Defence Force, when this is irrelevant because no Chief of the Defence force has been stripped of their honours, and so no longer possesses the titles Wikipedia claims they have. Each of the listings that page is completely and verifiably true. You want to add something that is completely and verifiably false. That is not an argument in your favour. The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Did you really think you were going to get away with adding hoax info to articles if you just waited two weeks before revert-warring again? Nice try. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- As another editor has already pointed out, the onus is on YOU to get consensus. Find another editor to agree with you, and keep the conversation on the QPS talk page. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 07:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Commander - Australian Navy Cadets.png listed for discussion
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Commander - Australian Navy Cadets.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 24
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Special Honours, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Parachute Regiment, Army Air Corps and Intelligence Corps. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
editGreetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXVI, October 2016
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Brisbane meetup
editCome along! Kerry (talk) 04:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
|
Brisbane Meetup
|
 | |
--Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 01:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Bolton's rank
editThe cited source of the Australian War Memorial reports Bolton served to 1918 at the rank of Lt Col.
Conversely, the Biographical Dictionary of the Australian Senate (Online edition) refers to Bolton retiring in 1920 at the rank honorary brigadier general after commanding Ballarat Training Depot.[1] The Australian Senate dictionary refers to several creditable sources. The Australian War Memorial cite does not.
So which rank was he? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AusMilitaryHistory (talk • contribs) 04:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- AusMilitaryHistory, I found a few more sources that support him being an honorary brigadier general, so I'm fine for it to say so in WP too. I did contact the AWM, apparently they rarely show honorary promotions on their records. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 01:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Nford24. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
New Challenge for Oceania and Australia
editHi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
edit  
|
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.
The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
By the way ...
editHappy New Year! Pdfpdf (talk) 07:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Pdfpdf! And Merry Christmas and Welcome back to popping into my watchlist! Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 10:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Perplexed ...
editAt a philosophical level, I'm interested by your edit.
This posting is more a comment on the whole page in general, not just the section in particular. (And certainly is NO reflection on, or comment about, you or your edit.) I'm just asking you for your opinion. (Because I can't think of anyone else to ask ... )
Why add the OAMs to wikipedia?
i.e. It's an awful lot of work, and what does it achieve? All of the information is in a file on gg.gov.au, and almost none of the people in the OAM list are notable, so almost none of the additions are blue links.
Perhaps I should start this on the talk page, but before I did that, I thought I'd sound you out for your pov first. Thanks for indulging me. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hey Pdfpdf, sorry I didn't respond sooner, I've been otherwise occupied for the last few days. I was mainly looking at just adding the military OAM's and any notable civil OAM's. I know of a few notable recipients from the southern QLD area (but none off the top of my head - with the exception of a very long standing new reporter from channel 7 from brisbane). I honestly have no issue if it's decided not to include the OAM's in this list and future lists, I know It's a massive task, and usually has me online for a while just doing some of the other smaller award's. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 22:23, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not advocating - just asking. Nor am I suggesting you change your plans. I was just wondering about the benefit gained vs the effort expended. As I have don't have the time (or interest) to do it, I guess I won't make any further comments or questions. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 22:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
March Madness 2017
editG'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.
For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Fair Use in Australia discussion
editAs an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery
The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:MAJGEN Angus Campbell.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:MAJGEN Angus Campbell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Question
editAnother question for you because I can't think of who else to ask! In recent Australian Honours articles, (e.g. 2017 Queen's Birthday Honours (Australia)), I notice the ribbons are captioned "XXX undress ribbon". I hadn't heard the term before. I assume the "dress ribbon" is the full length ribbon with a medal hanging from it? Pdfpdf (talk) 06:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Actually your guess is a good a mine. I assumed it might be a RAAF term. I've always heard of it being called a 'ribbon bar' unless the medal is attached, then it is just called a 'ribbon'. It was added last year I think by another editor to previous honours articles. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 07:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. When I'm in the mood, I'll look through the edit history and then ask the editor in question. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 08:00, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- (P.S. I, too, have always heard of it being called a 'ribbon bar' unless the medal is attached. Pdfpdf (talk) 08:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC))
- Thanks. When I'm in the mood, I'll look through the edit history and then ask the editor in question. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 08:00, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Boreen and Boreen Point
editMostly localities surrounding a town take the name of the town, but there are exceptions including Boreen and Boreen Point. Generally I just redirect the town article to the locality article and do a combined article noting that the name of the town and the locality are different. Is that OK with you? Kerry (talk) 07:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Kerry I live just down the road from Boreen Point, and have been there many times. The CBD is by the lake on a single road. The township of 'Boreen' simply doesn't exist. I ran as a Noosa Shire councillor candidate in the last election. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 14:40, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Well, this is the town map of Boreen according to the Queensland Government, which seems to be to be alive and well judging from Google Maps. I don't think we are disagreeing on what's actually there. It's just a question of official naming and common usage. Officially, the headland that juts into the lake is called Boreen Point, the cluster of streets and buildings near that point is the town of Boreen (as per the map), which sits within the locality of Boreen Point which includes the town and the surrounding bushland. But it would not surprise me that everyone just uses the name "Boreen Point" for all of it. The name Boreen is older; you can see the government selling town lots there in 1919. I am guessing that probably what caused people to switch to the name Boreen Point was a subdivision of land that was auctioned in 1933 and called Boreen Point Estate (see [1] top of column 3). The gazettal of a town just means that this is the centre of a distinct urban area, which basically means as little as cluster of houses around a few shops, so the development near the headland meets that definition. I think a redirect to the locality article with a mention that the town is officially gazetted as Boreen but that common usage is Boreen Point would sum up the situation pretty accurately. Kerry (talk) 22:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
add St John medal as per his uniform at the Museum of Democracy (Old Parliament House, Canberra). No big deal, but adding a link for that would be useful ... Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
editGreetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Australian post-nominals
editKindly stop reverting me on the post-nom list for Australia. Australia is not a fascist state and Australia citizens are entitled to use post-nominals they earn even if outside the government honors system. OLY is sanctioned in Australia via the Australian Olympic Committee via the IOC. The Wikipedia templates for post-noms are intended to be broad; the template and the Australian Governor-General/GPMC list of post-nominals are two separate things. —МандичкаYO 😜 06:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- You still need to provide references for the AOC sanction, otherwise it's classed as a foreign honour. You're correct that Australia isn't a fascist state, but you're the one that as to prove it's use in Australia. In Australia post-nominals are put in order as the DPMC (Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet) have authorised them. 1) National Honours 2) Legal office's 3) Academic Qualifications 4) Fellowships 5) Membership within Academic bodies 6) Parliamentary then defence designations. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 07:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Brisbane meetup - Sunday 10 December 2017 at The Edge, State Library of Queensland
editIf you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Sunday 10 December 2017 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there! Kerry (talk) 21:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, Nford24. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
I think I'm in the process of being slaughtered. Web image searches only seem to return pictures that match the .svg files. Any helpful ammunition could be useful ... Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 09:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
editAs we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
User group for Military Historians
editGreetings,
"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Brisbane meetup: Saturday 13 January 2018 at The Edge, State Library of Queensland
edit|
|
Brisbane Meetup
|
| | |
If you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Saturday 13 January 2018 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there!
The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 18
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of museums in Queensland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunshine Coast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Australian Corrections Medal moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Australian Corrections Medal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It also has an empty section and appears unfinished. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Kb.au (talk) 15:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- Why Kb.au? There are a number of editors that will want to add to the article now that the medal has been made public. I assume they can also edit this 'draft'? Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 17:15, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- Given the lack of any sources and the empty section it seemed the article wasn't ready for article space. If references are provided I will be more than happy to move it back. And yes, any editor is free to edit the draft and request an AFC reviewer move it to article space. Kb.au (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- Kb.au It has two references, which is more than most of the other Australian medal articles. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 00:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Australian Corrections Medal has been accepted
edit
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:QFES 2014 badge.png
edit
Thanks for uploading File:QFES 2014 badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive
editG'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
- updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Tim Macartney-Snape OAM AM issue
editYou are quite correct that AMs supersede OAMs-- I did not know that but having spoken with the Governor General's department, your comments on your edit are quite right, so my apologies for the little back and forth we had there. Press2014 (talk) 01:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Maybe?
editMaybe you want to put a {{db-author}} tag on it before someone else either copies it to commons or nominates it for deletion? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 05:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- (Reference: template:db-author - if you need it ... )
Question
editAs you're the only Navy expert I know, I thought I'd ask you. I was looking at Royal Australian Navy#Commissioned officers and thought "They don't really have 'Australia' at the bottom of their sleeves, do they?" Pdfpdf (talk) 08:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- No, on ceremonial uniforms, an 'Australia' tab is worn at the top of the sleeve on the shoulder. The images on that page are the officers' SRI's (Soft Rank Insignia) worn on all working uniforms and some ceremonial uniforms, the hardboards (the gold ones) are only worn on ceremonial uniforms (S1,S2,S3,S6). I hope that explains it. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 23:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 08:29, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Your reversion of my Wikipedia Page
editHi Nford24,
I'm puzzled by your reversion of my Wikipedia site, which you based on "copyright issues from Wheeler Books and many others". I'm the author of these novels, and I own the copyright. I would be grateful if you can provide an explanation as to why you believe I've breached my own copyright? Best wishes, Adrian d'Hagé — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adhage01 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- User:Adhage01, I think you'll find you'll need to talk to User:Sphilbrick. My last edit on that page was on 2 December 2017. Although now it's been brought to my attention, I can see a few Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies issues. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 00:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Adhage01: I'm sure it seems like an obvious mistake, but it turns out not to be.
- Because Wikipedia does not require identification to create a username, there is no guarantee you the editor are the same person as the author of the books. Now that you've declare that you are the same person is the author I have to point you to our guideline: Wikipedia:Autobiography, Which highly discourage his edits by the subject of an article. While there are some exceptions to this guideline, your edits are not one of those exceptions.
- The second issue is even if we can confirm that you are the owner of the copyright, it is not uncommon for copyright holders to be surprised at the licensing requirements. Many people have attempted to use her own words and wish to permit usage restricted to Wikipedia. This is not possible and words licensed for use in Wikipedia can be used by anyone anywhere for any purpose as long as they provide attribution. I dealt with many situations where copyright holder was initially interested and allowing their words to be used but upon understanding the requirements, decided did not wish to pursue the licensing.
- A third issue is not directly related to the copyright issue — we want the text in Wikipedia articles to be neutral and using words written by the subject is decidedly not neutral. As Nford24 has pointed out, your edits have introduced other violations of our policies. Given the not yet settled copyright issue, the editing in violation of our autobiography guideline and other violations of guidelines, I'm reverting the article back to an earlier version. You are welcome to look into providing a license for your words but I do not recommend this option.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Nford24, as you can see, I decided to revert to the version just after my removal of the material with a copyright issue. While proof by the editor of their identity, along with an explicit licensing of the material would resolve the copyright issue, it would not address the neutrality problem. I bringing this to your attention because you made edit after the removal and reversion, so if your edits were an improvement to the article you might have to reapply them.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:20, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Rollback granted
edit
Hi Nford24. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until {{{expiry}}}. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 21:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
edit
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Andrew Lloyd Webber
editI'm afraid I'm at a loss why you keep deleting Andrew Lloyd Webber's Kt post-nominal. You cite Knight Bachelor#Honorifics and post-nominals but the example given supports its use with Lloyd Webber, i.e. he is a Knight Bachelor as well as a peer. As a Knight Bachelor he would normally be titled 'Sir' but since that is obscured by his subsequent peerage the correct style would be adopt the post-nominal Kt. Phinn (talk) 07:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Phinn Being knighted a Knight Bachelor grants the usual 'sir' but has no post-nominal, since there is no post-nominal, there can't be one behind the name of a recipient. 'Kt' is short hand for 'Knight', which is placed after the name in updates of the London/Edinburgh Gazette. In the case of Lloyd-Webber, he was only knighted five years before receiving a peerage, so there is sufficient argument that he wasn't commonly known as Sir Andrew. But his knighthood can be mentioned in the lead if you wish, however it's already mentioned in the styles section which is sufficient. Of Knight Bachelor#Honorifics and post-nominals, neither of the examples use the 'Kt' in their articles either. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 08:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
I guess I am your flavor of the week?
editWhat is it that you are attempting to set up here? Something in retaliation for saying that the issue about the honours lists are confusing? I guess you will be following me for a while? If you found anything wrong with the industrialist article all you had to do was revert and go on your way following an explanation. Will you be my official WP actions' checker? That is not a hostile statement but just wondering just what is it that you are up to?2605:E000:9149:A600:34D8:EC05:8EC2:B095 (talk) 08:20, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- Or are you upset that there continues to be a question about Geoffrey Pattie article?2605:E000:9149:A600:34D8:EC05:8EC2:B095 (talk) 08:24, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- Your disruptive editing has come across by scope, yes. Your editing content with obviously little knowledge of the subject matter, which doesn't generally matter, but editing like you are en-masse will have you come up on a number of editors scopes.
- being knighted as a knight bachelor doesn't make the recipient a member of any other order (aka. the 'which distinction' you keep putting on articles). The award of Knight Bachelor is what would be referred to as a single grade award. I'd again suggest you check out Wikipedia:Teahouse to learn about editing Wikipedia. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 08:29, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- It has to be by mere logic more than just by scope. Just how many edits arr there that are being scoped? Using all your own time as if on a personal quest? Leave some of the scoping to other editors unless there is some behind the scenes system that WP has for letting others know about other editors?2605:E000:9149:A600:34D8:EC05:8EC2:B095 (talk) 08:49, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- WP does actually have that. If you sign up and learn about WP at Tea house you'll learn all about it. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 09:01, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- It has to be by mere logic more than just by scope. Just how many edits arr there that are being scoped? Using all your own time as if on a personal quest? Leave some of the scoping to other editors unless there is some behind the scenes system that WP has for letting others know about other editors?2605:E000:9149:A600:34D8:EC05:8EC2:B095 (talk) 08:49, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Oh, so you advocate that I not follow what is endorsed by WP and remain using my IP address as my identifier in order to use the Tea House? Sorry to tell you but it is not necessary for one to "sign up" which i assume is your saying to "register" a user name in order to use the tea house where if you ask a question about some portion of the minutia of WP they at least tell you it can be found there in the minutia and sometimes provide a link? Is that correct? At least that has been my understanding having edited since WP started years ago?2605:E000:9149:A600:34D8:EC05:8EC2:B095 (talk) 09:31, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- With this attitude you're going to get yourself blocked from editing Wikipedia. I have also advised you three times now to register. If you've been editing WP since it started than you'd understand why you're being disruptive with your editing. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 10:16, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have just listed a question on the tea house about the appropriateness of your statement. You have overstepped the bounds of community spirit. It does not matter what i know about WP especially when it comes to people who think they can bully themselves through life. This is not the place for it. Your bullying is not going to improve my editing. That is not a hostile statement unless that is how you in your mind set can only perceive someone who has just called your actions out. Now you may have the support of other WP editors that also feel threatened by this statement but again, that is not the WP way of community spirit and threatening people in this manner, and yes it is threatening people in whatever subtle way you might want to somehow avoid characterising it as such, but it is a threat. This is not your personal WIKIPEDIA. And i will not allow you to treat it as such. It is unfortunate that i have to take this action but what other form of address is their when you want to use some sort of perverted power to bully people.
Ivison Macadam edit
editDear Nford24,
Under Ivison Macadam's Honours and Decorations your edit is surely not quite correct now as is to leave only in brackets (Knight Bachelor). You are correct to have removed the KB as there is no post nominal for a Knight Bachelor (just the prefix of Sir). I had put Knighted and (Knight Bachelor) 1955 would follow. You would need to put Knighted or Knight before it for clarity. You could also just put instead Knight Bachelor but that is not the usual form in an elevation to knighthood that is used in publications or the media and the general reader will not know what it refers to. For instance Who's Who uses Kt !955 (Kt being their abbreviation for Knight) but for an encylopedia entry it is in my view better to clarify as simply as possible and if you prefer Knight it would be equally correct followed by (Knight Bahcelor) 1955.
Your Gazette entry as a footnote is a good addition. I appreciate you researching this. Well done. Note it was the Queen's Birthday Honours 1955 - not New Years as you originally had further up in the King's College section. As you will realise the reversion there from your edit was to the actual text of King's Delegacy minutes which was/is in blockquote and I believe, in this case but am not positive, was written by General Sir John Hackett, who was then Principal of King's.
I could change to Knight before the brackets if you wish but you may wish to do so yourself as you have corrected your entry somewhat already and I would be glad to have you do so as it is orphaned at the moment.
Many thanks. William Macadam (talk) 12:28, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLVIII, August 2018
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Per the Department of Home Affairs (Australia), it is a successor to the Department of Immigration and Border Protection of which Peter Dutton was the minister, as reliable sources also say. Onetwothreeip (talk) 05:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Onetwothreeip, The Department of Home Affairs (Australia) was reestablished, but the position of Minister for Home Affairs (Australia) has almost always existed. Dutton is the 32nd person to hold such ministry. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 05:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- The post-2017 department is a successor of the immigration portfolio, not a revival of the historic department. This is what all our Wikipedia articles say. A department by the name of Home Affairs also has existed only less than half of the Commonwealth's history. Onetwothreeip (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- The section links to Minister for Home Affairs (Australia), which shows a pretty clear timeline of 'minister's of home affairs', the last being in 2013. In the table on that article, he's listed as the 32nd holder. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 06:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- We don't number them on the articles of the ministers. This article clearly shows there was no such minister from 1932 to 1977, 1984 to 2007 (except for one year), and 2013 to 2017. Onetwothreeip (talk) 06:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- The section links to Minister for Home Affairs (Australia), which shows a pretty clear timeline of 'minister's of home affairs', the last being in 2013. In the table on that article, he's listed as the 32nd holder. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 06:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- The post-2017 department is a successor of the immigration portfolio, not a revival of the historic department. This is what all our Wikipedia articles say. A department by the name of Home Affairs also has existed only less than half of the Commonwealth's history. Onetwothreeip (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Australian royal honours
edit
Template:Australian royal honours has been nominated for merging with Template:Orders, decorations, and medals of Australia. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 10:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
editNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)