MarkIblog
Welcome!
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, MarkIblog! Thank you for your contributions. I am Aranya and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! —Aranya (talk | contribs) 16:35, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Diyemowei Oluchi Lily
editHello MarkIblog,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Diyemowei Oluchi Lily for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Speedy deletion nomination of Gaius Chibueze
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Gaius Chibueze requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 10:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Diyemowei Odior Lily
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Diyemowei Odior Lily, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 19:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Signature
editHi, your signature makes it difficult to identify you. You can request that your account be renamed to AfrowriterX, or you could change your signature to "AfrowriterX (a.k.a. MarkIblog)". It also looks like you may be signing out to add extra comments to Talk:Diyemowei Odior Lily, remember to stay logged in when commenting in a given topic. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MarkIblog. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 00:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC) |
Why i dont think it fair enough to block my account as i have been of help to many articles here concerning celebrities in my country i only spoke my mind concerning the article which was tagged for speeedy delection am not in any way related to the editor or article and i think my page should be unblocked AfrowriterX (talk) 07:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
- @MarkIblog being dishonest even in the light of the glaring evidence against you shows an unwillingness to change & a trait of not being here to help build an encyclopedia Please do not damage the reputation of Nigerian editors & editors residing in Nigeria by being economical with the truth, if you must be unblocked you must come clean & disclose how many accounts you edit with & also disclose if or not you are one & the same person as the subject of your article: Gaius Chibueze but if not, disclose(tell us) if he has given you any financial reward (Nigerian Naira) to help create his article.Celestina007 (talk) 13:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Unblocked
edit
MarkIblog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why I don't think it fair enough to block my account as I have been of help to many articles here concerning celebrities in my country I only highlighted some review concerning a page tagged for speedy deletion in which I came across and spoke my mind concerning the article which was tagged for speedy deletion am not in any way related to the editor I think my page should be unblocked. I own only 2 accounts here on Wikipedia in which I was trying to access but was having problem logging in have been editing Wikipedia for close to 3years now and have never used my account for anything illegal pls I plead on my behalf and promise it will never happen again thanks and God bless Celestina007 @Celestina007 AfrowriterX (talk) 13:38, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Ran another check and there is definitely 
Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts as noted at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MarkIblog/Archive. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Requesting to unblock my account Please!
edit MarkIblog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please am writing to you guys requesting for a quick update on unblocking my account as i have not been able to make any edit or contribution. pls I plead on my behalf and promise it will never happen again thanks and God bless Nnadigoodluck Versace1608 Ponyo(talk)AfrowriterX (talk) 11:54, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is abusive. If you wish to be unblocked, you need to address your multiple violations. WP:GAB will help you understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock Request
editGood Day Administrators, I Now Understand what i did and why i have been blocked, and will never repeat it self. i vow and plead not do it again. and i agree to follow Wikipedia community customs. the only reason i did open this account was to help the community grow futher and i promise, intend to help contribute to the encyclopedia immediately after unblocked request has been approved. Thank You
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willie XO until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.