Welcome!

Hello, MajorMinorMark, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 18:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Hensley

edit

Careful. I was working on that. Don't assume admins don't know what they're doing. DS (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey Mark, if you want, you can withdraw the nomination, and someone will close it out. Just post a note at the AFD to that effect, and it'll be taken care of. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 18:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

RE:WWII in HD

edit

Thanks for the logo, but are you sure it isn't copyrighted? Also, I already had a more accurate image that is also larger too, so could you please remove your logo? Thanks, – ĈĠ, Super Sounders Fan (help line|§|sign here) 01:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

November 2009

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoygabsadds 02:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MajorMinorMark (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I believe there must be some sort of mix-up here with another user, could I see any related edits that have me and this other user linked?

Decline reason:

It is patently obvious you are a longtime user at Wikipedia with a deep familiarity with esoteric aspects of the Wikipedia community. Regardless of whether or not the blocking admin got the specific person you are correct, this account is being used in violation of WP:SOCK, and has rightly been shut down. Jayron32 06:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MajorMinorMark (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I used to be a Wikipedia vandal under many other accounts, but now I have reformed. I am sorry. To show that I am willing to cooperate and admit to my past history, I will list every account that I have used below this following request for unblock. All I ask is that the blocking administrator reviews this.

Decline reason:

That you continue to engage in socking is a clear indication that you do not intend to abide by Wikipedia policies. If your original account still has talk page access, you should make further unblock requests there. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:12, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Actually, I wouldn't be as harsh as Beeblebrox here, if you agree to abide by the Wikipedia:Standard offer, I think we could possibly explore a return to the fold. Basically, I would be willing to support an unblock if you:
  • Abide by the rules of Wikipedia by creating no more sock puppet accounts at all
  • Abide by the terms of your indefinite block by making no attempt to edit Wikipedia for multiple months (The offer above states 6 months as "standard"; though I think that an extended, multiple month term is fine, and would show a good-faith desire to obey the rules)
  • Agree to, once unblocked, stick to one account. It need not be your first account; this one would be fine (since we have an unambiguous history below).
  • If you can abide by these terms, come back in a few months, and post another unblock request THEN, and I will start a discussion at WP:ANI to judge consensus for a return. I have done this many times, and everyone that I have seen that has abided by these terms has been allowed to edit. If you continue to sock, you will continue to be blocked. --Jayron32 02:18, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppets that were used.

edit
  • User:A1a2s
  • User:A1a4s
  • User:A1a6s
  • User:AndyCrogonka
  • User:Attguylol
  • User:BC6
  • User:Boingerbox
  • User:Bulbasaur the pokemon
  • User:BulbasaurCharmander6
  • User:CaptianOlimar1234567890
  • User:Crowdo
  • User:Cuddles734
  • User:Daisypress
  • User:Dsaasdasdboz
  • User:Flaky465
  • User:Giggles3254
  • User:HPNMan
  • User:JamesAltec12
  • User:JamieAhoy
  • User:LaughingPickles12
  • User:My name is the master of all of the 5's
  • User:My name is the master of all of the 6's
  • User:PSNMand
  • User:PSPBot
  • User:Parappa663
  • User:Parappa664
  • User:Parappa665
  • User:Petunia465
  • User:PickYourLeader14
  • User:PickbothBot
  • User talk:Pickbothmanlol4
  • User:Pickbothmanlol6
  • User:PlaystationBot
  • User:SPCUClerksbot
  • User:Schoolblock
  • User:Squirtle the pokemon
  • User:T7465
  • User:TheGoldenSubpageTester
  • User:Tollund man
  • User:Toothy7465
  • User:Vanlalizer warner
  • User:WheresDaSockAccountz11

AndyCrogonka subfamily

edit
  • User talk:AltecCrog
  • User:AndyBot
  • User:AndyCrogonka
  • User talk:AndysCrogz1
  • User:AndysCrogz1
  • User:AndyzBot
  • User:Bot-From-Another-World
  • User:ClueBot XX
  • User talk:IcemanCrogonk
  • User:NUsedBot
  • User:S-J-S-F-M-W
  • User:SNESCDADDON

The original family of accounts that started this list

edit
  • User:A1a2s (this was my first account despite what CheckUser claims it to be.)
  • User:A1a4s
  • User:A1a6s

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Promotional drafts

edit

  Wikipedia:Promotional drafts, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Promotional drafts and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Promotional drafts during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 18:36, 2 August 2018 (UTC)Reply