Li1411

Welcome!

Hello, Li1411, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Daniella Cicarelli. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello Mvcg66b3r, thank you for the warm welcome and the helpful resources. I appreciate the guidance and links you've shared and look forward to learning more. Thanks again for your support! Li1411 (talk) 16:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 08:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Accidental Revert

Hi Li1311,

I’m a new wiki editor, and I think I accidentally reverted one of your edits today. I’m not sure how it happened, but it showed up in my contribution log. I’m sorry and I hope you know how to revert it. If not, I really hope you can redo your edits and that you understand. Kind regards Ferieninsel001 (talk) 14:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you for letting know. I see now - it's a draft I am working on. I will revert your changes, but if you want to participate - you are welcome! Best, Li1411 (talk) 19:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Dmitry Rybolovlev

Hi Li1411! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Less Unless (talk) 14:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Less Unless (talk) 14:53, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Sorry! The user clearly protects the edits made by another user which I believe are biased. Of course I have no poof, but please look at them - the information is clearly not neutral over all 3 related pages. Li1411 (talk) 15:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)