Welcome to Wikipedia

edit

Hi, K3vin. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ~ К3вину (RSVP) (What) 03:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

and we begin --K3vin 00:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Tabcan-all.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Crane Lake Township

edit

Thanks for attempting to add Crane Lake Township; I have fixed the link. The reason that I reverted is that you added Crane Lake, Minnesota, which is not an article about the township; the correct article, Crane Lake Township, Minnesota, you didn't add to the template at all. By the way, in your edit summary, you gave part of a link before it cut you off, http://cranela What is the link that you intended to give? Nyttend (talk) 13:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Norwegian Americans

edit

As a 1/8th Norwegian American I thought I should let you know that they're trying to delete a category to which you belong. - Schrandit (talk) 17:38, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Athens of the West

edit

The Athens of the West addition to the Lexington Page did not align to the right as intended but overlapped the existing picture of Downtown Lexington, so I removed it. I assume it's an original work and as such may not adhere to Wikipedia standards as it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Team4Technologies (talkcontribs) 03:25, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

While I appreciate your enthusiasm for Lexington being called the Athens of the West, an anonymous and uncited poem does not lend credence to its title. I don't like to delete things but Wikipedia has notability guidelines and it behooves us all to abide by them.
If you have the means to, get a picture of the historical placard on Main Street (near the Jefferson bridge) that declared Lexington the Athens of the West (if it's still there). I do not live there anymore otherwise I would. I've added the nickname to the infobox to replace more colloquial and less notable nicknames. There are even government pages that label Lexington the AOTW [1] so the nickname is pretty well pinned down already. Sorry for any misunderstanding on this. - Team4Technologies (talk) 23:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

David Winters (choreographer)

edit

You may want to revisit this page as it appears another user has added a load of BS to it. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

vielen danke
Ok, so I have OCD tendencies on the citations for David Winters. As it so happens, my taxicab is in the shop, and I am using this article as a break between other tasks I have. When working toward my Masters Degree Economics 1993 University of Kentucky, I was noted for my extensive bibliographies. I took the citation tag a bit personally, and decided to Pile it Higher and Deeper. But instead of dung, I piled it with unimpeachable sources. --K3vin (talk) 04:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

K3vin - How do I contact / email you? Wikibbb —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikibbb (talkcontribs) 17:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

image

edit

{{subst:Please link images|Image:K3vinfb.png}}

David Winters I did not even have the chance (3 minutes???) to explain why I did what I did before you reverted. As I said in my discussion. Perhaps I am just too tired, but it made sense to me. Please pay me the respect of a reply --K3vin (talk) 09:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

There really is no need to take the revert personally. I put a link in my edit summary to show you the rules on this (WP:MOSDAB, red links section and section on external links); it wouldn't matter why you had put the entry like that, it isn't allowed on dabs. If you think this person is notable, perhaps it is worth starting an article on him? Then he could be added onto the dab. Regards, Boleyn (talk) 09:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

COPIED AND PASTED FROM ARTICLE'S DISCUSSION PAGE: I've added a red link onto the Doolittle article and added Winters here, as David Winters (Democratic politician) (to differentiate from Dave Winters who is a Republican politician. Please change if you feel something else might be more appropriate, both here and on the Doolittle article. We only know if the person is mentioned in other articles if there's a red link to them on it. We then click on 'What links here'; if nothing, it can't be kept on the dab, as this is just to give links to Wikipedia articles. If it has a link, we add it on, with the relevant blue link (see WP:MOSDAB red links). Hope you're happier with the way the page is now. Regards, Boleyn (talk) 10:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Boleyn

Kirk Douglas

edit

Hi. There wasn't a lot wrong with your addition. I removed the part about the notability of the program, mostly because it may be more notable for the fact that it had Kirk Douglas starring in a made-for-TV musical, not at all related to Broadway. After I looked at my changes, I realized that the predominant reason I was fixing the refs didn't even get changed. In the last two cites, I just removed the parameters that weren't used, there's no need to retain those. This is the format I used for the (now changed) first ref:

  • <ref>[http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/14555/Dr-Jekyll-and-Mr-Hyde/overview "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1973)."] ''[[New York Times]]'' Review. Retrieved October 1, 2008.</ref>

and yours:

  • <ref>[[New York Times]] Review [http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/14555/Dr-Jekyll-and-Mr-Hyde/overview Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1973)]</ref>

In general, the format would be: <ref>Author if named. [url= "Title."] ''Newspaper, magazine, publication''. Date of issue. Retrieved: When it was first used.</ref>

I made sure the refs didn't have spaces between them, that there was punctuation before the refs and the title was italicized. That's it. Hope that helps. Wildhartlivie (talk) 12:29, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sunshine Magazine

edit

I am modeling an article on Sunshine (magazine) after that of Coronet (magazine), a magazine of similar state. Sunshine is a defunct general interest digest, with a focus on "feel good" stories and unsourced anecdotes. It is not to be confused with the in print United Kingdom "Mum's Magazine" --K3vin (talk) 02:08, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Book of sunshine at amazon.comReply

Potential Rewrites

edit

Welcome 2 Ibiza

edit

You only need to add "(film)" or "(year film)" to an article title if that title is already used. Regarding unreleased films, I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for but the appropriate tag for forthcoming films is {{Future film}}. You're more than welcome to join WP:FILM if this is a subject area you're interested in! Regards. PC78 (talk) 16:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS Welcome

edit
Welcome!
 

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
  • Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 (talk) 04:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Heinrichs1947.png)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Heinrichs1947.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removing the tag

edit

It is very clear that Winters meets the criteria for notability for people in the creative arts. He meets it a number of ways. If someone wants to challenge that, then start a AfD and get it settled. Just putting that tag up there and leaving it indefinately is ridiculous. It creates a false impression of the article. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ə

edit

the schwa--K3vin (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Casey, Crime Photographer

edit

I appreciate the note, and I'm glad to see someone working on a radio-related project. I think that in all the listings that I ran across, the title was shortened to Crime Photographer for the sake of brevity, and sometimes even to Crime Photo. I've been interested in recreating the schedules for the days before "Must See TV", when the entertainment was more along the lines of "Must Hear". Great article too-- I'm old enough to remember Madge from the Palmolive commercials ("You're soaking in it!"), but not old enough to know that she was a radio player before that. Mandsford (talk) 00:20, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

If I knew the first thing about graphics, I could create a colorful table that showed the daily schedules, year by year. Do I understand right that you're a graduate of U.K.? I went to law school there, class of '85, and grew up in Lexington. It's been a 63-5 kind of day. Mandsford (talk) 00:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Radio Listing Scans

edit

--K3vin (talk) 00:57, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

List of [whoever] productions

edit

Wikipedia is not a directory. There is no encyclopedic purpose to be served by creating an article listing everything (trivial or notable) that a professional has ever done. That role is filled by websites such as the IMDb and its counterparts. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

If the main article was bloatedly long, there might be a case to be made for creating a separate list article, with the appropriate content. Instead, this was an empty and unjustified spinoff of a shortish article about a person of limited notability. I don't think the WP:LISTS language relevant here. (By the way, you have to be meticuloursly careful about capitalization; due to the eccentricities of Wikimedia software, a missed capital will lose you your way entirely when navigating among cross-references.) --Orange Mike | Talk 13:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:Kirk Douglas

edit

Template:Kirk Douglas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:50, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films October 2008 Newsletter

edit

The October 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have suggestions or comments related to the newsletter, please leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you and happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wintersemmynom1 6.JPG)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Wintersemmynom1 6.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

David Winters

edit

Thank you so much for your kind words. I'm glad you found my changes to be helpful because even though we're not suppose to, some people get a bit own-y when it comes to the articles they create (I know I do!). I stumbled upon the Winters article after reading the Space Mutiny page yesterday because yes, I'm a geeky MSTie and that's one of my all time favorite episodes (Big McLargeHuge!). As for the article being less than perfect, it wasn't that bad. Truth be told, I found the article to be informative, and since that's the point of any article, you're definitely on the right track. I usually have to search for high and low for sources when I do a clean up, so I can't thank you enough for providing such great sources. The only real problem was structure and cohesion, but those can be easily fixed. Regarding the spelling errors, the only reason I do catch them is because of Firefox's redlined spellcheck feature! I actually laughed when I read that in your message because that's the only way I catch misspelled words 99.9% of the time (I'm a craptacular speller myself).

I don't think you're at the point where anyone has to follow you around, but if you ever need any help regarding an article, feel free to contact me. I'm a pretty horrible writer, but I'm a great cleaner upper so I'm always happy to lend a hand regarding that. It actually gives me a break from doing über important things like adding infoboxes to obscure television show articles. By the way, it's beyond cool that you've corresponded with Winters and you met Mike Nelson! I can understand why Winters wants to distance himself from Space Mutiny, but he should really be proud of it. People (myself included) still love that movie even if it is for all the wrong reasons. Pinkadelica Say it... 07:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Joan Alexander

edit

Hi Kevin, I just saw your note to me. I have another vintage Joan Alexander article I can email to you. It's in two jpg images. I looked around for your email address but was unsuccessful. I could not find a PM system here at Wikipedia, either. What is your TV.com user name? We can use the PM system there. Thanks, Suzanne astorino (talk) 07:49, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Space Mutiny

edit

Unfortunately I don't, I just wasn't a party to the discussion in question and so thought it had been removed because the new one was better. If it's a rotation thing, that's fine. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 18:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

unfortunately, the one out of phase was deleted as unused non-free. I'll dig up another copy --K3vin (talk) 17:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Albedo One

edit

Thanks for the note re Albedo One. I don't have any stake in that publication, but I'm glad to see science fiction magazines taken seriously and properly covered in WP. Thanks! Gabrielbodard (talk) 21:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films November 2008 Newsletter

edit

The November 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. My apologies for the late delivery, and thanks go to both Wildroot and Erik for writing the newsletter. Remember that anyone can edit the newsletter, so feel free to help out! Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films December 2008 Newsletter

edit

The December 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading File:50deadmenwalkingr.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Caseycrimephotogcd.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 13:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading File:WheelTVGuide.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS Questionnaire

edit

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:08, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Winters-Inside-Deep-Throat-2.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Winters-Inside-Deep-Throat-2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films January 2009 Newsletter

edit

The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject Films newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films February 2009 Newsletter

edit

The February 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Movinnorway.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Movinnorway.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS Coordinator nominations

edit

WP:FILMS Coordinator Election

edit

WikiProject Films March 2009 Newsletter

edit

The March 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:THRASHIN Starring Josh Brolin(Star of this year academy award film NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN ) (Large).JPG)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:THRASHIN Starring Josh Brolin(Star of this year academy award film NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN ) (Large).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:24, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films April 2009 Newsletter

edit

The April 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 07:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Black Mask3501.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Black Mask3501.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films May 2009 Newsletter

edit

The May 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 23:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films June 2009 Newsletter

edit

The June 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 08:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Tankgirl05.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Tankgirl05.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films July 2009 Newsletter

edit

The July 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 01:04, 2 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit
 
WikiProject Kentucky
Welcome to our project!
Thank you for joining WikiProject Kentucky. Please take a few moments and look over our project page and the various project departments. We encourage every member to find their niche and work on the parts of the project they most enjoy. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask on our project talk page. Again, welcome!

Acdixon (talk contribs count) 14:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


Proposed deletion of Jules Verne's 'Mystery on Monster Island

edit
 

The article Jules Verne's 'Mystery on Monster Island has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page is a redirect from an apparent implausible typo, as it lacks a closing quote (in an already uncommon spelling). The likely intended redirect page has since been created at Jules Verne's 'Mystery on Monster Island'.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Poga — (talk) 08:25, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films August 2009 Newsletter

edit

The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Wintersthrashinbb.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:19, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILM September Election Voting

edit

The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 01:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:David Winters Producer

edit

 Template:David Winters Producer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 16:53, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films September 2009 Newsletter

edit

The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 06:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS October Newsletter

edit

The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 06:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive and Roll Call

edit

File:Heinrichs1947pd.png listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Heinrichs1947pd.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 13:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Radio actor templates

edit

I have nominated Category:Radio actor templates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — TAnthonyTalk 04:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:THRASHIN Starring Josh Brolin(Star of this year academy award film NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN ) (Large).JPG

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:THRASHIN Starring Josh Brolin(Star of this year academy award film NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN ) (Large).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:King makernw.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:King makernw.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Newman1971.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Newman1971.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pat O'Daniel

edit

I've left another question for you on the Pappy O'Daniel talk page and also a comment. Could you take a look? — e. ripley\talk 12:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


Audio theatre

edit

Hi, I am a person from Germany. Possibly you can look on the discussion of the article: Audio theatre, because you have made edits in the past on articles which are related with it. with friendly greetings, Soenke --Soenke Rahn (talk) 00:16, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Wintersemmynom1 6.JPG listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wintersemmynom1 6.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Winters-DrJekyl.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Winters-DrJekyl.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:13, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

edit
 

Hello, K3vin! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:Mary Lincoln house lexington KY Todd House.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Mary Lincoln house lexington KY Todd House.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
Hello, K3vin! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! K3vin (talk) 03:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

File:Black_Mask3501.jpg

edit

I saw your comment at Sisyphos23's talk page about changing the license on this image. It doesn't really matter the amount of work done to the image to clean it up, it's still copyrighted since it was published in 1935 or so. The image was merely cleaned up and not altered to change it in any major way. It would still have to be a fair-use image. Hope that helps! – Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 07:28, 6 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

John Y. Brown, Sr.

edit

I believe the comment you placed on my talk page about John Y. Brown, Sr. was in error since the edit you reverted was done by User:Canuckian89, not by me. Islander99 (talk) 02:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Touring

edit

Sounds good. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 03:22, 15 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:WHEEL-1971-on-set.JPG

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:WHEEL-1971-on-set.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Gertrudewarner.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Gertrudewarner.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Sunshine63.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Sunshine63.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Sunshinemag.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Sunshinemag.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit

File:Black Mask3501.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Black Mask3501.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. damiens.rf 19:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey, man.

edit

I've missed you a little, not that I'd admit it. Anyway, it's good to see you still editing a bit (last month is still, right?). I hope you're well. Cheers. ~ Isarra (talk) (stalk) 05:49, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

i am a bit crippled computerwise, in that i lost my laptop power cord,nor have internet hooked up. i cannot even capitalize on this phone with the wiki edit script. kevin
Well, in that case, that you managed this much is rather impressive. Sorry about your troubles with you computeriness; I hope you get it sorted out soon. And find the cord. ~ Isarra (talk) (stalk) 23:46, 12 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
I feel like I have joined the future ~ К3вину (RSVP) (What) 00:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

edit
 

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 02:38, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

edit
 

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle

edit
Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited
 
Seattle Public Library
  • Date Saturday, December 8, 2012
  • Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m.
  • Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104
  • Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
  • Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki.
  • Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration.

Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Islewood.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Islewood.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 05:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:34-09-Black mask.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:34-09-Black mask.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 22:50, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am in contact with the presumed copyright owner, in order to obtain a free license. K3vin = ~ К3вину (RSVP) (What) 21:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:Islewood.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Islewood.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:08, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

fixed it in good faith to the best of my current abilities. If this is still not up to snuff, steps can be taken to have it unimpeachable. It just seems like a big waste of time to have to do such on something as inconsequential as a sales brochure for a building, then owned by person that gave me the sales brochure to use in an article about the building which was the subject of an article. I have a 100% rate of getting images I care about, staying on WP. See the Paul Newman one as an example. Same source as this. I got him to ask his webmaster to post the disputed image on his official website with the correct license. In this case, I dispute the dispute, and do not wish to be required to bother someone, while they are directing a movie in Florida, to get his www updated for something so trivial as the subject of this dispute. But I will, if it comes down to that. Let it go. It is legal, the owner said so and that can be proven. ~ К3вину (RSVP) (What) 22:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikimeetup Kentucky? Join us at THATCamp KY, June 1-2, 2013

edit
Wikimeetup Kentucky - We need you!
Hi K3vin! I'm helping to organize THATCamp Kentucky - June 1 & 2 at the University of Kentucky in Lexington. Take a look at the Tentative Schedule. Let's get together in person to work on Kentucky-related wikipedia pages, what do you say? If you have any questions, please email the THATCamp KY Organizer, Lee Skallerup Bessette (Morehead State University, @readywriting) at [email protected]. Please sign up to participate Wikimeetup Kentucky. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! Randolph.hollingsworth (talk) 18:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
whoops, I had better update something, I left Kentucky, in 2011. I'd have been all about this, had I not moved, ~ К3вину (RSVP) (What) 01:33, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wayzata Post Office

edit

In 2008, you created the Wayzata Post Office article, about a section of Hennepin County, Minnesota, but I can't find a source confirming that the section exists, and without a source it's likely that the article will be deleted. Do you know of a source? There's a deduction about this at Talk:Wayzata Post Office, Minnesota. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 20:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the information. I am not sure I am much help. I have found wikipeida can be not as much about accuracy but about decisions being made, and refusal top change their mind. I jumped in on the talk page. But will probably end up editing the page for Wayzata to clarify the confusion of which I speak. I was a resident of Minnetonka, with a Wayzata zip code and a student of Hopkins Schools. This may explain my motivation. A geo map of post office will illustrate the region of which I discuss. But there is no named area. It is a defacto census designated place by virtue of common zip code, and multiple jurisdictions. Like a miniature metro area ~ К3вину (RSVP) (What) 03:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Friday's Child (1965 song) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Friday's Child (1965 song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friday's Child (1965 song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fru1tbat (talk) 20:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

thank you greatly for the heads up. But as I understand thinking a 5 year old article makes wikipoedia a worse place than it could be, I do not see the value in destroying content that is true and completing of a topic. If a fraction of the energy put into trolling to delete, was put toward creating content, we would have far fewer stubs. As a content creator, the joy of seeing a stub get expanded by impassioned editors, and guessing the article may have never been written had not been for the initiative of the stub creator, is like a literary and educational equivalent to a child growing up and blossoming. I guess I have more a live and let live, albeit create and let sit policy. ~ К3вину (RSVP) (What)
First of all, you should know that this is the first article I've ever AfD'd (I think), so I hardly fall into the camp of excising Wikipedia of all but the most stringently-acceptable content. That being said, I didn't see any likelihood that this article would be expanded significantly beyond what it is now, and as a first-time visitor to the article myself, I was disappointed at the lack of content. I believe that this sort of experience is somewhat detrimental to the encyclopedia, and while I agree that stubs in general should be left for future expansion, this one seemed to warrant consideration for merging/deletion. I will leave it to the community to decide, of course. Thanks for your response. --Fru1tbat (talk) 23:31, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Woah fellow wikipedean, I know nothing about you. We both agree we want wikipedia to be a better place. This is not me saying you are a troll, but speak of those trolling for articles to delete or criticize, without fixing expanding or helping. You may well be a super fan of Hazelwood and were hoping for the ultimate treatise of his least remembered song. Finding it in such a stub state with no interest it became your nomination. My point about deleters or taggers, is the energy put into the act of making the latterday newspeak dictionary thinner and thinner, could be instead plowed into looking in the all music guide, rolling stone archives, google book search to expand it with things of great topical import. But if it takes time for a stub with an audience to take root so be it. Wikipedia started as a stub to what was to be a real great online encyclopedia, but the vetting process took so long people started just writing into the wiki. How far we've come. Please, if you are so inclined, look up a few topics here, for Pat Odaniel and his hillbilly boys. A strongly opinioned merger/deleter decided two articles were "close enough" but never bothered to merge the differing content. I could care less about Friday's child, my beef is the culture of delete, vote, nobody cares, outcome whatever - discourages people from creating new articles. I lost track of the number of half baked stubs I started 5 years ago, but, start them I did. Combining this into a larger article about the album or tv special is a perfectly fine solution, but really, is a long drawn out vote of this article's merits worth anybody's time? ~ К3вину (RSVP) (What)
Point(s) taken - and I didn't mean to sound so defensive in my previous reply. --Fru1tbat (talk) 02:10, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
I have defensive tendencies as well. as may be witnessed in my surreal but successful undelete battle to which I assign the title The Todd house matter copied from Commons to my userspace for easier access. Saul Good ~ К3вину (RSVP) (What)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bronzechargcbc.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Bronzechargcbc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:26, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Several upcoming Wikipedia events in Kentucky

edit
Lexington Pride Festival : June 27, 2015. Location: Lexington Pride Festival venues. Take photographs of the Lexington Pride Festival and upload them to Wikimedia Commons.
Wiki Loves Pride edit-a-thon : June 30, 2015. 7:00 pm. Location to be determined.

Meet up for a picnic with other Wikipedian in Kentucky on July 25, 2015 from 12:00-3:00pm.

Sign up on event pages. Sydney Poore/FloNight♥♥♥♥ 00:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

I should figure out how to identify with Thor, MN, as I moved from Lexington a while back. Miss it though,m would love to attend/have attended this ~ К3вину (RSVP) (What) 18:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

edit
  You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:David winters movin w nancy sinatra.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:David winters movin w nancy sinatra.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:RAW NERVE Starring Glen Ford Jan-Michael Vincent Tracy Lords (Large).JPG

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:RAW NERVE Starring Glen Ford Jan-Michael Vincent Tracy Lords (Large).JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:RaquelMayan.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:RaquelMayan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 21:07, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Leftquotek3v.png

edit
 

The file File:Leftquotek3v.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Rightquotek3v.png

edit
 

The file File:Rightquotek3v.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

2019 US Banknote Contest

edit
  US Banknote Contest  
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.


If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Imperial court templates

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Imperial court templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:10, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Nighttrapfilm1993.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Nighttrapfilm1993.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Newman1971.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Newman1971.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Raquel70.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Raquel70.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply